E1-6010 vs Core 2 Duo SP7500

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core 2 Duo SP7500
2008
2 cores / 2 threads, 20 Watt
0.34
E1-6010
2014
2 cores / 2 threads, 10 Watt
0.34

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Duo SP7500 and E1-6010 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking31223131
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoAMD E-Series
Power efficiency1.613.23
Architecture codenameMerom (2006−2008)Beema (2014)
Release date15 January 2008 (17 years ago)29 April 2014 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Duo SP7500 and E1-6010 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Boost clock speed1.6 GHz1.35 GHz
Bus rate800 MHzno data
L2 cache4 MB1024 KB
Chip lithography65 nm28 nm
Die sizeno data107 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data90 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Duo SP7500 and E1-6010 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
Socketno dataFT3b
Power consumption (TDP)20 Watt10 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo SP7500 and E1-6010. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno data86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX
AES-NI-+
FMA-FMA4
AVX-+
PowerNow-+
PowerGating-+
VirusProtect-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Duo SP7500 and E1-6010 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
IOMMU 2.0-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Duo SP7500 and E1-6010. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3
Max memory channelsno data1

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon R2 Graphics
Enduro-+
Switchable graphics-+
UVD-+
VCE-+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core 2 Duo SP7500 and E1-6010 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core 2 Duo SP7500 and E1-6010 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno dataDirectX® 12
Vulkan-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core 2 Duo SP7500 and E1-6010.

PCIe versionno data2.0
PCI Express lanesno data8

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Core 2 Duo SP7500 0.34
E1-6010 0.34

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Core 2 Duo SP7500 1766
+75.6%
E1-6010 1006

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Core 2 Duo SP7500 2781
+55.9%
E1-6010 1784

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Core 2 Duo SP7500 982
+5.9%
E1-6010 927

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Recency 15 January 2008 29 April 2014
Chip lithography 65 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 20 Watt 10 Watt

E1-6010 has an age advantage of 6 years, a 132.1% more advanced lithography process, and 100% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Core 2 Duo SP7500 and E1-6010.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Duo SP7500
Core 2 Duo SP7500
AMD E1-6010
E1-6010

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Core 2 Duo SP7500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 569 votes

Rate E1-6010 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Core 2 Duo SP7500 and E1-6010, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.