FX-8320E vs Celeron M 423
Primary details
Comparing Celeron M 423 and FX-8320E processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | not rated | 1527 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 0.87 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | Celeron M | no data |
| Architecture codename | Yonah (2005−2006) | Vishera (2012−2015) |
| Release date | no data | 2 September 2014 (9 years ago) |
| Current price | $550 | $140 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Celeron M 423 and FX-8320E basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 8 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 3.2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.06 GHz | 4 GHz |
| Bus support | 533 MHz | no data |
| L2 cache | no data | 8192 KB |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 32 nm |
| Die size | no data | 315 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 71 °C |
| Number of transistors | no data | 1,200 million |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | Yes |
| P0 Vcore voltage | no data | Min: 1.075 V - Max: 1.2875 V |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron M 423 and FX-8320E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | no data | AM3+ |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 5 Watt | 95 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 423 and FX-8320E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | no data | + |
| FMA | no data | + |
| AVX | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M 423 and FX-8320E are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M 423 and FX-8320E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR3 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron M 423 and FX-8320E.
| PCIe version | no data | n/a |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 1 | 8 |
| Threads | 1 | 8 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 32 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 5 Watt | 95 Watt |
We couldn't decide between Celeron M 423 and FX-8320E. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Celeron M 423 is a notebook processor while FX-8320E is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 423 and FX-8320E, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
