Xeon W-3223 vs Pentium M ULV 900

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated930
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data4.26
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesPentium MIntel Xeon W
Power efficiencyno data6.44
DesignerIntelIntel
Architecture codenameBanias (2003)Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
Release dateno data3 June 2019 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$749

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Pentium M ULV 900 and Xeon W-3223 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads116
Base clock speedno data3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed0.9 GHz4.2 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 3.0
Bus rate400 MHz4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplierno data35
L1 cacheno data512 KB
L2 cacheno data8 MB
L3 cacheno data16.5 MB
Chip lithography130 nm14 nm
Maximum core temperatureno data68 °C
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Pentium M ULV 900 and Xeon W-3223 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1 (Uniprocessor)
Socketno dataFCLGA3647
Power consumption (TDP)1 MB160 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium M ULV 900 and Xeon W-3223. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® AVX-512
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Pentium M ULV 900 and Xeon W-3223 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium M ULV 900 and Xeon W-3223 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium M ULV 900 and Xeon W-3223. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4-2666
Maximum memory sizeno data1 TB
Max memory channelsno data6
Maximum memory bandwidthno data128.001 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium M ULV 900 and Xeon W-3223.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data64

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 1 8
Threads 1 16
Chip lithography 130 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 1 Watt 160 Watt

Pentium M ULV 900 has 15900% lower power consumption.

Xeon W-3223, on the other hand, has 700% more physical cores and 1500% more threads, and a 828.6% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Intel Pentium M ULV 900 and Intel Xeon W-3223. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Pentium M ULV 900 is a notebook processor while Xeon W-3223 is a server/workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium M ULV 900
Pentium M ULV 900
Intel Xeon W-3223
Xeon W-3223

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2 3 votes

Rate Pentium M ULV 900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 6 votes

Rate Xeon W-3223 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Pentium M ULV 900 and Xeon W-3223, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.