Xeon 3.2 vs Celeron M 370
Primary details
Comparing Celeron M 370 and Xeon 3.2 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | Celeron M | no data |
| Architecture codename | Dothan (2004−2005) | Irwindale (2004) |
| Release date | no data | June 2004 (19 years ago) |
| Current price | $130 | $482 |
Detailed specifications
Celeron M 370 and Xeon 3.2 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | 1.5 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 1.5 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| Bus support | 400 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | no data | 16 KB |
| L2 cache | no data | 2 MB |
| L3 cache | 1 MB L2 Cache | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 90 nm |
| Die size | no data | 169 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | no data | 178 million |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
| VID voltage range | 1.004V-1.292V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron M 370 and Xeon 3.2 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | H-PBGA478,H-PBGA479,PPGA478 | 604 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 21 Watt | 135 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 370 and Xeon 3.2. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | - | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
| Idle States | - | no data |
| Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
| PAE | 32 Bit | no data |
| FSB parity | - | no data |
| Status | Discontinued | no data |
Security technologies
Celeron M 370 and Xeon 3.2 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | no data |
| EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M 370 and Xeon 3.2 are enumerated here.
| VT-x | - | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M 370 and Xeon 3.2. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| ECC memory support | - | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Power consumption (TDP) | 21 Watt | 135 Watt |
We couldn't decide between Celeron M 370 and Xeon 3.2. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Celeron M 370 is a notebook processor while Xeon 3.2 is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 370 and Xeon 3.2, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
