Celeron 6305 vs J1900

Place in the ranking	2678	2260
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Series	Intel Celeron	Intel Tiger Lake
Power efficiency	6.81	8.26
Architecture codename	Bay Trail-D (2013)	Tiger Lake-U (2020)
Release date	1 November 2013 (11 years ago)	1 September 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$82	no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron J1900 and Celeron 6305 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	4 (Quad-Core)	2 (Dual-core)
Threads	4	2
Base clock speed	2 GHz	no data
Boost clock speed	2.42 GHz	1.8 GHz
Bus rate	no data	4 GT/s
L1 cache	224 KB	160 KB
L2 cache	2 MB	2.5 MB
L3 cache	2 MB L2 Cache	4 MB
Chip lithography	22 nm	10 nm SuperFin
Maximum core temperature	105 °C	100 °C
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron J1900 and Celeron 6305 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1	1
Socket	FCBGA1170	FCBGA1449
Power consumption (TDP)	10 Watt	15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron J1900 and Celeron 6305. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	no data	Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI	-	+
AVX	-	+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	+	no data
Speed Shift	no data	+
Turbo Boost Technology	-	-
Hyper-Threading Technology	-	-
Idle States	no data	+
Thermal Monitoring	-	+
PAE	36 Bit	no data
FDI	-	no data
RST	-	no data
Deep Learning Boost	-	+

Security technologies

Celeron J1900 and Celeron 6305 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT	no data	-
EDB	+	no data
SGX	no data	-
OS Guard	no data	+
Anti-Theft	-	no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron J1900 and Celeron 6305 are enumerated here.

VT-d	-	+
VT-x	+	+
EPT	no data	+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron J1900 and Celeron 6305. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR3	DDR4
Maximum memory size	8 GB	64 GB
Max memory channels	2	2

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card	Intel® HD Graphics for Intel Atom® Processor Z3700 Series	Intel® UHD Graphics for 11th Gen Intel® Processors
Quick Sync Video	+	+
Clear Video HD	no data	+
Graphics max frequency	854 MHz	1.25 GHz
Execution Units	no data	48

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron J1900 and Celeron 6305 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron J1900 and Celeron 6305 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.4	no data	4096x2304@60Hz
Max resolution over eDP	no data	4096x2304@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPort	no data	7680x4320@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron J1900 and Celeron 6305 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX	no data	12.1
OpenGL	no data	4.6

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron J1900 and Celeron 6305.

PCIe version	2.0	no data
PCI Express lanes	4	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron J1900 0.72

Celeron 6305 1.31
+81.9%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron J1900 1151

Celeron 6305 2080
+80.7%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Celeron J1900 173

Celeron 6305 750
+334%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Celeron J1900 515

Celeron 6305 1264
+145%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.72	1.31
Recency	1 November 2013	1 September 2020
Physical cores	4	2
Threads	4	2
Chip lithography	22 nm	10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	10 Watt	15 Watt

Celeron J1900 has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and 50% lower power consumption.

Celeron 6305, on the other hand, has a 81.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, and a 120% more advanced lithography process.

The Celeron 6305 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron J1900 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron J1900 and Celeron 6305, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.