Celeron 6305 vs J1800

Primary details

Comparing Celeron J1800 and Celeron 6305 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking	3051	2275
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Series	Intel Celeron	Intel Tiger Lake
Power efficiency	3.41	8.27
Architecture codename	Bay Trail-D (2013)	Tiger Lake-U (2020)
Release date	1 November 2013 (11 years ago)	1 September 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$72	no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron J1800 and Celeron 6305 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	2 (Dual-core)	2 (Dual-core)
Threads	2	2
Base clock speed	2.41 GHz	no data
Boost clock speed	2.58 GHz	1.8 GHz
Bus rate	no data	4 GT/s
L1 cache	112 KB	160 KB
L2 cache	1 MB	2.5 MB
L3 cache	1 MB L2 Cache	4 MB
Chip lithography	22 nm	10 nm SuperFin
Maximum core temperature	105 °C	100 °C
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron J1800 and Celeron 6305 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1	1
Socket	FCBGA1170	FCBGA1449
Power consumption (TDP)	10 Watt	15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron J1800 and Celeron 6305. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	no data	Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI	-	+
AVX	-	+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	+	no data
Speed Shift	no data	+
Turbo Boost Technology	-	-
Hyper-Threading Technology	-	-
Idle States	no data	+
Thermal Monitoring	-	+
PAE	36 Bit	no data
FDI	-	no data
RST	-	no data
Deep Learning Boost	-	+

Security technologies

Celeron J1800 and Celeron 6305 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT	no data	-
EDB	+	no data
SGX	no data	-
OS Guard	no data	+
Anti-Theft	-	no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron J1800 and Celeron 6305 are enumerated here.

VT-d	-	+
VT-x	+	+
EPT	no data	+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron J1800 and Celeron 6305. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR3	DDR4
Maximum memory size	8 GB	64 GB
Max memory channels	2	2

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card Compare	Intel HD Graphics for Intel Atom Processor Z3700 Series	Intel UHD Graphics for 11th Gen Intel Processors
Quick Sync Video	+	+
Clear Video HD	no data	+
Graphics max frequency	792 MHz	1.25 GHz
Execution Units	no data	48

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron J1800 and Celeron 6305 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported

2

4

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron J1800 and Celeron 6305 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.4	no data	4096x2304@60Hz
Max resolution over eDP	no data	4096x2304@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPort	no data	7680x4320@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron J1800 and Celeron 6305 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX	no data	12.1
OpenGL	no data	4.6

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron J1800 and Celeron 6305.

PCIe version	2.0	no data
PCI Express lanes	4	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

---

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Performance score	0.36	1.31
Integrated graphics card	0.77	5.58
Recency	1 November 2013	1 September 2020
Chip lithography	22 nm	10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	10 Watt	15 Watt

---

Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron J1800 and Celeron 6305, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---