Intel Celeron N2920 vs J1850

#ad
Buy
VS

Combined performance score

Celeron J1850
0.61

N2920 outperforms J1850 by 2% in our combined benchmark results.

General info

Comparing Celeron J1850 and Celeron N2920 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking26382632
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel CeleronIntel Celeron
Architecture codenameBay Trail-D (2013)Bay Trail-M (2013−2014)
Release date1 September 2013 (10 years old)1 December 2013 (10 years old)
Launch price (MSRP)$82$107
Current priceno data$278 (2.6x MSRP)

Technical specs

Celeron J1850 and Celeron N2920 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed2 GHz1.86 GHz
Boost clock speed2 GHz2 GHz
L1 cache224 KB56K (per core)
L2 cache2 MB512K (per core)
L3 cache2 MB L2 Cache0 KB
Chip lithography22 nm22 nm
Maximum core temperature100 °C105 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Celeron J1850 and Celeron N2920 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1170FCBGA1170
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt7.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron J1850 and Celeron N2920. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI--
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle Statesno data+
SIPP-no data
PAE36 Bitno data
Smart Connectno data+
FDI-no data
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued
RST--

Security technologies

Celeron J1850 and Celeron N2920 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB++
Identity Protection--
Anti-Theft--

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron J1850 and Celeron N2920 are enumerated here.

VT-d--
VT-x++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron J1850 and Celeron N2920. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size8 GB8 GB
Max memory channels22
ECC memory support-no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for Intel Atom® Processor Z3700 SeriesIntel® HD Graphics for Intel Atom® Processor Z3700 Series
Quick Sync Video--
Graphics max frequency792 MHz844 MHz
InTru 3D--

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron J1850 and Celeron N2920 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported22

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron J1850 and Celeron N2920.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanes44
USB revisionno data3.0 and 2.0
Total number of SATA portsno data2
Number of USB portsno data5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron J1850 0.61
Celeron N2920 0.62
+1.6%

N2920 outperforms J1850 by 2% in our combined benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Celeron J1850 942
Celeron N2920 950
+0.8%

N2920 outperforms J1850 by 1% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 0.61 0.62
Recency 1 September 2013 1 December 2013
Cost $82 $107
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 7 Watt

We couldn't decide between Celeron J1850 and Celeron N2920. The differences in performance seem too small.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron J1850 and Celeron N2920, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

User ratings

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron J1850
Celeron J1850
Intel Celeron N2920
Celeron N2920

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 11 votes

Rate Intel Celeron J1850 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 30 votes

Rate Intel Celeron N2920 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron J1850 or Celeron N2920, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.