Atom x5-E8000 vs Celeron G3900TE

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron G3900TE
2015
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
1.21
+92.1%

Celeron G3900TE outperforms Atom x5-E8000 by an impressive 92% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron G3900TE and Atom x5-E8000 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking23562784
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.35no data
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Celeron5x Intel Atom
Power efficiency3.1511.49
Architecture codenameSkylake (2015−2016)Cherry Trail (2015−2016)
Release date19 October 2015 (9 years ago)8 February 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$42$39

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron G3900TE and Atom x5-E8000 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads24
Boost clock speed2.3 GHz1.04 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier2310
L1 cache128 KBno data
L2 cache512 KB2 MB
L3 cache2 MB0 KB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die size98.57 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data90 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron G3900TE and Atom x5-E8000 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketLGA-1151no data
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron G3900TE and Atom x5-E8000. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron G3900TE and Atom x5-E8000 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron G3900TE and Atom x5-E8000. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3L-1600DDR3
Maximum memory size64 GB8 GB
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth34.134 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics 510Intel HD Graphics

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron G3900TE and Atom x5-E8000.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes164

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron G3900TE 1.21
+92.1%
Atom x5-E8000 0.63

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron G3900TE 1850
+92.3%
Atom x5-E8000 962

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.21 0.63
Integrated graphics card 1.61 0.77
Recency 19 October 2015 8 February 2016
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 2 4
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 5 Watt

Celeron G3900TE has a 92.1% higher aggregate performance score, and 109.1% faster integrated GPU.

Atom x5-E8000, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 months, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and 600% lower power consumption.

The Celeron G3900TE is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom x5-E8000 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron G3900TE and Atom x5-E8000, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron G3900TE
Celeron G3900TE
Intel Atom x5-E8000
Atom x5-E8000

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 2 votes

Rate Celeron G3900TE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 58 votes

Rate Atom x5-E8000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron G3900TE or Atom x5-E8000, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.