Atom x5-E8000 vs Core 2 Duo P8700

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Core 2 Duo P8700
2009
2 cores / 2 threads
0.62
+1.6%

Core 2 Duo P8700 outperforms Atom x5-E8000 by a minimal 2% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Duo P8700 and Atom x5-E8000 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking26542664
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core 2 Duo5x Intel Atom
Architecture codenamePenryn (2008−2011)Cherry Trail (2016)
Release date1 January 2009 (15 years ago)8 February 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$209$39
Current price$71 (0.3x MSRP)$340 (8.7x MSRP)

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Duo P8700 and Atom x5-E8000 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads24
Base clock speed2.53 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.53 GHz1.04 GHz
Bus support1066 MHzno data
L2 cache3 MB2 MB
L3 cache3 MB L2 Cache0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm14 nm
Die size107 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Number of transistors410 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo
VID voltage range1V - 1.25Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Duo P8700 and Atom x5-E8000 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketBGA479,PGA478no data
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo P8700 and Atom x5-E8000. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NIno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Core 2 Duo P8700 and Atom x5-E8000 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Duo P8700 and Atom x5-E8000 are enumerated here.

VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Duo P8700 and Atom x5-E8000. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data8 GB

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel HD Graphics

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core 2 Duo P8700 and Atom x5-E8000.

PCIe versionno data2.0
PCI Express lanesno data4

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Core 2 Duo P8700 0.62
+1.6%
Atom x5-E8000 0.61

Core 2 Duo P8700 outperforms Atom x5-E8000 by 2% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Core 2 Duo P8700 963
+2.1%
Atom x5-E8000 943

Core 2 Duo P8700 outperforms Atom x5-E8000 by 2% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Core 2 Duo P8700 305
+67.6%
Atom x5-E8000 182

Core 2 Duo P8700 outperforms Atom x5-E8000 by 68% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Core 2 Duo P8700 489
Atom x5-E8000 597
+22.1%

Atom x5-E8000 outperforms Core 2 Duo P8700 by 22% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

Core 2 Duo P8700 2805
+208%
Atom x5-E8000 910

Core 2 Duo P8700 outperforms Atom x5-E8000 by 208% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Core 2 Duo P8700 5169
+60.6%
Atom x5-E8000 3219

Core 2 Duo P8700 outperforms Atom x5-E8000 by 61% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Core 2 Duo P8700 2254
+32.2%
Atom x5-E8000 1704

Core 2 Duo P8700 outperforms Atom x5-E8000 by 32% in 3DMark06 CPU.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

Core 2 Duo P8700 31.6
+9.4%
Atom x5-E8000 34.57

Atom x5-E8000 outperforms Core 2 Duo P8700 by 9% in wPrime 32.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.62 0.61
Recency 1 January 2009 8 February 2016
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 2 4
Cost $209 $39
Chip lithography 45 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 5 Watt

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Core 2 Duo P8700 and Atom x5-E8000.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Duo P8700 and Atom x5-E8000, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Duo P8700
Core 2 Duo P8700
Intel Atom x5-E8000
Atom x5-E8000

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 164 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo P8700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 54 votes

Rate Atom x5-E8000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Duo P8700 or Atom x5-E8000, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.