Turion 64 MK-38 vs Celeron G3900E

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron G3900E
2016
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
1.28
+457%
Turion 64 MK-38
1 core / 1 thread, 31 Watt
0.23

Celeron G3900E outperforms Turion 64 MK-38 by a whopping 457% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron G3900E and Turion 64 MK-38 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking22913191
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.18no data
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel CeleronTurion 64
Power efficiency3.460.70
Architecture codenameSkylake (2015−2016)Richmond
Release date2 January 2016 (8 years ago)no data
Launch price (MSRP)$107no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron G3900E and Turion 64 MK-38 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads21
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz2.2 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/s800 MHz
Multiplier24no data
L1 cache128 KBno data
L2 cache512 KBno data
L3 cache2 MBno data
Chip lithography14 nm90 nm
Die size98.57 mm2no data
Number of transistors1750 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron G3900E and Turion 64 MK-38 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)no data
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt31 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron G3900E and Turion 64 MK-38. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron G3900E and Turion 64 MK-38 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron G3900E and Turion 64 MK-38. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesLPDDR3-1866no data
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth34.134 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 510no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron G3900E and Turion 64 MK-38.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.28 0.23
Physical cores 2 1
Threads 2 1
Chip lithography 14 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 31 Watt

Celeron G3900E has a 456.5% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.

Turion 64 MK-38, on the other hand, has 12.9% lower power consumption.

The Celeron G3900E is our recommended choice as it beats the Turion 64 MK-38 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron G3900E and Turion 64 MK-38, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron G3900E
Celeron G3900E
AMD Turion 64 MK-38
Turion 64 MK-38

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2 1 vote

Rate Celeron G3900E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 12 votes

Rate Turion 64 MK-38 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron G3900E or Turion 64 MK-38, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.