i3-6102E vs Celeron G3900E

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron G3900E
2016
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
1.28
Core i3-6102E
2015
2 cores / 4 threads, 25 Watt
1.48
+15.6%

Core i3-6102E outperforms Celeron G3900E by a moderate 16% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron G3900E and Core i3-6102E processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking22932170
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.180.12
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel CeleronIntel Core i3
Power efficiency3.465.60
Architecture codenameSkylake (2015−2016)Skylake (2015−2016)
Release date2 January 2016 (8 years ago)12 October 2015 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$107$225

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Celeron G3900E has 50% better value for money than i3-6102E.

Detailed specifications

Celeron G3900E and Core i3-6102E basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads24
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz1.9 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0DMI 3.0
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/s4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplier2419
L1 cache128 KB128 KB
L2 cache512 KB512 KB
L3 cache2 MB3 MB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die size98.57 mm298.57 mm2
Number of transistors1750 Million1750 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron G3900E and Core i3-6102E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt25 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron G3900E and Core i3-6102E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
TSX-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron G3900E and Core i3-6102E are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron G3900E and Core i3-6102E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesLPDDR3-1866LPDDR3-1866
Maximum memory size64 GB64 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth34.134 GB/s34.134 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics 510Intel HD Graphics 530

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron G3900E and Core i3-6102E.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes1616

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron G3900E 1.28
i3-6102E 1.48
+15.6%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron G3900E 2034
i3-6102E 2349
+15.5%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.28 1.48
Integrated graphics card 1.61 2.60
Recency 2 January 2016 12 October 2015
Threads 2 4
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 25 Watt

Celeron G3900E has an age advantage of 2 months.

i3-6102E, on the other hand, has a 15.6% higher aggregate performance score, 61.5% faster integrated GPU, 100% more threads, and 40% lower power consumption.

The Core i3-6102E is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron G3900E in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron G3900E and Core i3-6102E, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron G3900E
Celeron G3900E
Intel Core i3-6102E
Core i3-6102E

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2 1 vote

Rate Celeron G3900E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 4 votes

Rate Core i3-6102E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron G3900E or Core i3-6102E, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.