Xeon 3065 vs Celeron E3400

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron E3400
2010
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.54

Xeon 3065 outperforms Celeron E3400 by a minimal 2% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron E3400 and Xeon 3065 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking28522848
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.72no data
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Power efficiency0.790.80
Architecture codenameWolfdale (2008−2010)no data
Release date17 January 2010 (14 years ago)1 October 2007 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$76no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron E3400 and Xeon 3065 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)no data
Threads2no data
Base clock speed2.6 GHz2.33 GHz
Boost clock speed2.6 GHzno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache1 MB (shared)no data
L3 cache0 KB4 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography45 nm65 nm
Die size82 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature74 °C72 °C
Number of transistors228 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range0.85V-1.3625V0.85V-1.5V

Compatibility

Information on Celeron E3400 and Xeon 3065 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketLGA775PLGA775
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron E3400 and Xeon 3065. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Demand Based Switchingno data-
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

Celeron E3400 and Xeon 3065 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron E3400 and Xeon 3065 are enumerated here.

VT-d-no data
VT-x++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron E3400 and Xeon 3065. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron E3400 and Xeon 3065.

PCIe version2.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron E3400 0.54
Xeon 3065 0.55
+1.9%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron E3400 860
Xeon 3065 867
+0.8%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.54 0.55
Recency 17 January 2010 1 October 2007
Chip lithography 45 nm 65 nm

Celeron E3400 has an age advantage of 2 years, and a 44.4% more advanced lithography process.

Xeon 3065, on the other hand, has a 1.9% higher aggregate performance score.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Celeron E3400 and Xeon 3065.

Note that Celeron E3400 is a desktop processor while Xeon 3065 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron E3400 and Xeon 3065, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron E3400
Celeron E3400
Intel Xeon 3065
Xeon 3065

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 273 votes

Rate Celeron E3400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 4 votes

Rate Xeon 3065 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron E3400 or Xeon 3065, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.