Celeron Dual-Core T3100: specs and benchmarks

VS

Aggregated performance score

It provides poor benchmark performance at 0.76% of a leader's which is a 96-core Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WXRyzen ThreadripperPRO 7995WX
Compare

Summary

Intel started Celeron Dual-Core T3100 sales 1 September 2009. This is a Penryn architecture notebook processor primarily aimed at office systems. It has 2 cores and 2 threads, and is based on 45 manufacturing technology, with a maximum frequency of 1900 MHz and a locked multiplier.

Compatibility-wise, this is BGA479, PGA478 processor with a TDP of 35 Watt.

Primary details

Celeron Dual-Core T3100 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and pricing.

Place in performance ranking2529
Place by popularitynot in top-100
Market segmentLaptop
SeriesIntel Celeron Dual-Core
Architecture codenamePenryn (2008−2011)
Release date1 September 2009 (14 years ago)
Current price$32 of 15701 (Xeon Platinum 8276L)

Detailed specifications

Basic microprocessor parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters can generally indicate CPU performance, but to be more precise you have to review its test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)
Threads2
Boost clock speed1.9 GHzof 6.2 (Core i9-14900KS)
Bus support800 MHz
L1 cache128 KBof 7475.2 (Apple M2 Pro 10-Core)
L2 cache1 MBof 96 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX)
Chip lithography45 nmof 3 (Apple M3 Max 16-Core)
Die size107 mm2
Number of transistors410 Millionof 92000 (Apple M3 Max 16-Core)
64 bit support+
Windows 11 compatibility-
Unlocked multiplierNo

Compatibility

Information on Celeron Dual-Core T3100 compatibility with other computer components and devices: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketBGA479, PGA478
Power consumption (TDP)35 Wattof 400 (Xeon Platinum 9282)

Benchmark performance

Single-core and multi-core benchmark results of Celeron Dual-Core T3100. Overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron Dual-Core T3100 0.76

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Celeron Dual-Core T3100 1174

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

Celeron Dual-Core T3100 1900

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Celeron Dual-Core T3100 3740

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Celeron Dual-Core T3100 1687

Gaming performance

Closest competitors

Overall Celeron Dual-Core T3100 performance compared to nearest competitors among notebook CPUs.


Celeron Dual-Core T3100 100

AMD equivalent

According to our data, the closest AMD alternative to Celeron Dual-Core T3100 is A6-3400M, which is faster by 1% and higher by 10 positions in our ranking.

A6-3400MA63400M
Compare

Here are some closest AMD rivals to Celeron Dual-Core T3100:

A4-9120 103.95
A6-3400M 101.32
A4-3300M 101.32
Celeron Dual-Core T3100 100
A6-5357M 98.68
E2-3800 97.37
A6-5345M 96.05

Similar processors

Here is our recommendation of several processors that are more or less close in performance to the one reviewed.

Recommended GPUs

People consider these graphics cards to be good for Celeron Dual-Core T3100, according to our PC configuration statistics.

These are the fastest graphics cards for Celeron Dual-Core T3100 in our user configuration statistics. There is a total of 240 configurations using Celeron Dual-Core T3100 in our database.

Community ratings

Here is the rating given to the reviewed processor by our users. Let others know your opinion by rating it yourself.


3.4 32 votes

Rate Celeron Dual-Core T3100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron Dual-Core T3100, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.