A4-3300M: specs and benchmarks

VS

Aggregated performance score

It provides poor benchmark performance at 0.77% of a leader's which is Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WXRyzen ThreadripperPRO 7995WX
Compare

Summary

AMD started A4-3300M sales 14 June 2011. This is a Llano architecture notebook processor primarily aimed at office systems. It has 2 cores and 2 threads, and is based on 32 nm manufacturing technology, with a maximum frequency of 2500 MHz and a locked multiplier.

Compatibility-wise, this is AMD Socket FS1 processor with a TDP of 35 Watt. It supports DDR3 memory.

General info

A4-3300M processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and pricing.

Place in performance ranking2506
Place by popularitynot in top-100
Market segmentLaptop
SeriesAMD A-Series
Architecture codenameLlano (2011−2012)
Release date14 June 2011 (12 years ago)
Current price$61 of 17802 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX)

Technical specs

Basic microprocessor parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters can generally indicate CPU performance, but to be more precise you have to review its test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)
Threads2
Base clock speed1.9 GHzof 4.7 (Ryzen 9 7900X)
Boost clock speed2.5 GHzof 6.2 (Core i9-14900KS)
L1 cache128 KB (per core)of 7475.2 (Apple M2 Pro 10-Core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)of 96 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX)
L3 cache0 KBof 786432 (EPYC 7773X)
Chip lithography32 nmof 3 (Apple M3 Max 16-Core)
Die size228 mm2
Number of transistors1,178 millionof 9900000 (Ryzen 5 7645HX)
64 bit support+
Windows 11 compatibility-
Unlocked multiplierNo

Compatibility

Information on A4-3300M compatibility with other computer components and devices: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1of 8 (Xeon Platinum 8160M)
SocketFS1
Power consumption (TDP)35 Wattof 400 (Xeon Platinum 9282)

Technologies and extensions

Technological capabilities and additional instructions supported by A4-3300M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions3DNow!, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4a, DDR3 Memory Controller, Radeon HD 6480G

Virtualization technologies

Supported virtual machine optimization technologies. Some are specific to Intel only, some to AMD.

AMD-V+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel number of RAM supported by A4-3300M's memory controller. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequency may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of a GPU integrated into A4-3300M.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon HD 6480G

Benchmark performance

Single-core and multi-core benchmark results of A4-3300M. Overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A4-3300M 0.77

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

A4-3300M 1186

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

A4-3300M 227

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

A4-3300M 399

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

A4-3300M 1742

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

A4-3300M 3417

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

A4-3300M 1556

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

A4-3300M 1

Gaming performance

Relative performance

Overall A4-3300M performance compared to nearest competitors among notebook CPUs.


Intel equivalent

According to our data, the closest Intel alternative to A4-3300M is Celeron N3150, which is nearly equal in speed and higher by 5 positions in our ranking.

Celeron N3150CeleronN3150
Compare

Here are some closest Intel rivals to A4-3300M:

Similar processors

Here is our recommendation of several processors that are more or less close in performance to the one reviewed.

A6-3400MA63400M
Compare
i7-640UMCore i7640UM
Compare
i7-680UMCore i7680UM
Compare
Pentium N3530PentiumN3530
Compare
Core 2 Duo T9900Core 2Duo T9900
Compare

Recommended GPUs

People consider these graphics cards to be good for A4-3300M, according to our PC configuration statistics.

These are the fastest graphics cards for A4-3300M in our user configuration statistics. There is a total of 1428 configurations based on A4-3300M in our database.

RTX 4090 GeForce RTX 4090
0.4% (5/1428)
RTX 3090 Ti GeForce RTX 3090 Ti
0.1% (2/1428)
RTX 3080 Ti GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
0.07% (1/1428)
RTX 3070 GeForce RTX 3070
0.07% (1/1428)
RTX 4060 GeForce RTX 4060
0.1% (2/1428)
RTX 3060 GeForce RTX 3060
0.4% (5/1428)
RX 5700 XT Radeon RX 5700 XT
0.07% (1/1428)
RX 6600 XT Radeon RX 6600 XT
0.07% (1/1428)
RX 6600 Radeon RX 6600
0.4% (5/1428)
RX 6650M Radeon RX 6650M
0.2% (3/1428)

User Ratings

Here is the rating given to the reviewed processor by our users. Let others know your opinion by rating it yourself.


3 96 votes

Rate A4-3300M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about A4-3300M, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.