Intel Celeron Dual-Core T3100 vs AMD Turion II Neo K685

Intel Celeron Dual-Core T3100
AMD Turion II Neo K685

General info

Comparing Celeron Dual-Core T3100 and Turion II Neo K685 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture and sales start time and price.
Place in performance rating
 
Type
Laptop
 
Laptop
Series
Intel Celeron Dual-Core
 
AMD Turion II Neo
Achitecture codename
Penryn
 
Geneva
Release date
1 September 2009
 
15 December 2010

Technical specs

Celeron Dual-Core T3100 and Turion II Neo K685 quantitative parameters such as cores and threads number, clocks, manufacturing process, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of Celeron Dual-Core T3100 and Turion II Neo K685 performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Number of cores
2
 
2
Number of threads
2
 
2
Maximum frequency
1.9 GHz
 
1.8 GHz
FSB
800 MHz
 
3200 MHz
L1 cache
128 KB
 
256 KB
L2 cache
1024 KB
 
1024 KB
Manufacturing process technology
45 nm
 
45 nm
Die size
107 mm2
 
n/d
Transistor count
410 Million
 
n/d
64 bit support
+
 
+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron Dual-Core T3100 and Turion II Neo K685 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one.
Socket
BGA479, PGA478
 
S1g4
Power consumption (TDP)
35 Watt
 
15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron Dual-Core T3100 and Turion II Neo K685. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
VirusProtect
-
 
+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron Dual-Core T3100 and Turion II Neo K685 are enumerated here.
AMD-V
-
 
+

Benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmarks performance of Celeron Dual-Core T3100 and Turion II Neo K685. Overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.

Overall benchmark performance

Celeron Dual-Core T3100 3.69
Turion II Neo K685 3.73 +1.1%

3DMark06 CPU

Celeron Dual-Core T3100 1687 +16.3%
Turion II Neo K685 1451

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Celeron Dual-Core T3100 1900 +33.4%
Turion II Neo K685 1424

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Celeron Dual-Core T3100 3740 +21.3%
Turion II Neo K685 3083

Passmark

Celeron Dual-Core T3100 1174
Turion II Neo K685 1186 +1%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good Celeron Dual-Core T3100 and Turion II Neo K685 are for gaming compared with game system requirements. Remember that sometimes official requirements may reflect real performance inaccurately.

Advantages of Intel Celeron Dual-Core T3100

We are unaware of any advantages of Intel Celeron Dual-Core T3100 over AMD Turion II Neo K685.

Advantages of AMD Turion II Neo K685

1.1% faster in synthetic tests
Much newer (15 December 2010 vs 1 September 2009)
Less power hungry (15 vs 35 watts)
MMX (MultiMedia Extensions - the very first (1996) SIMD instruction expansion for Intel desktop CPUs, works with 64-bit registers)
SSE (Streaming SIMD Instructions - a SIMD instruction extension working with 128-bit registers)
AMD64 (AMD CPUs 64-bit architecture. Almost identical to Intel 64, save for some little and rarely used nuances)
Virtualization (Hardware acceleration of virtual machines)
Enhanced Virus Protection (EVP)

So, Celeron Dual-Core T3100 or Turion II Neo K685?

Technical City couldn't decide between Intel Celeron Dual-Core T3100 and AMD Turion II Neo K685. The differences in performance seem too small.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron Dual-Core T3100 and Turion II Neo K685, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Cast your vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favourite CPU.
Intel Celeron Dual-Core T3100
AMD Turion II Neo K685
Like
Like

Advices and comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron Dual-Core T3100 or Turion II Neo K685, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.