Celeron M 540 vs Dual-Core T1400
Primary details
Comparing Celeron Dual-Core T1400 and Celeron M 540 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Celeron Dual-Core | Celeron M |
| Architecture codename | Merom-2M (2008) | Merom (2006−2008) |
| Release date | 1 May 2008 (16 years ago) | 1 October 2007 (16 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Celeron Dual-Core T1400 and Celeron M 540 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 1 |
| Boost clock speed | 1.73 GHz | 1.86 GHz |
| Bus support | 533 MHz | 533 MHz |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | 1 MB |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 65 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron Dual-Core T1400 and Celeron M 540 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | P | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 30 Watt |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 1 May 2008 | 1 October 2007 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 1 |
| Threads | 2 | 1 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 30 Watt |
Celeron Dual-Core T1400 has an age advantage of 7 months, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.
Celeron M 540, on the other hand, has 16.7% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Celeron Dual-Core T1400 and Celeron M 540. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron Dual-Core T1400 and Celeron M 540, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
