Sempron 3850 vs Celeron 6305

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron 6305
2020
2 cores / 2 threads, 15 Watt
1.35
+82.4%

Celeron 6305 outperforms Sempron 3850 by an impressive 82% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron 6305 and Sempron 3850 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking21462577
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Tiger Lakeno data
Architecture codenameTiger Lake-UKabini (2013−2014)
Release date1 September 2020 (3 years ago)9 April 2014 (10 years ago)
Current priceno data$99

Detailed specifications

Celeron 6305 and Sempron 3850 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads24
Boost clock speed1.8 GHz1.3 GHz
L1 cache160 KB256 KB
L2 cache2.5 MB2048 KB
L3 cache4 MBno data
Chip lithography10 nm SuperFin28 nm
Die sizeno data107 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C90 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data90 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 6305 and Sempron 3850 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1449AM1
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt25 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 6305 and Sempron 3850. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
FMAno dataFMA4
AVX++
PowerTuneno data-
TrueAudiono data-
PowerNowno data+
PowerGatingno data+
Out-of-band client managementno data-
VirusProtectno data+
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
SIPP-no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Celeron 6305 and Sempron 3850 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
SGX-no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 6305 and Sempron 3850 are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data
IOMMU 2.0no data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 6305 and Sempron 3850. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR3-1600
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels21
ECC memory support-no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® UHD Graphics for 11th Gen Intel® ProcessorsAMD Radeon R3 Graphics
Number of pipelinesno data128
Quick Sync Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Endurono data+
Switchable graphicsno data1
UVDno data+
VCEno data+
Graphics max frequency1.25 GHzno data
Execution Units48no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron 6305 and Sempron 3850 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported4no data
DisplayPortno data+
HDMIno data+

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron 6305 and Sempron 3850 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2304@60Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP4096x2304@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort7680x4320@60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron 6305 and Sempron 3850 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12.1DirectX® 12
OpenGL4.6no data
Vulkanno data1

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 6305 and Sempron 3850.

PCIe versionno data2.0
PCI Express lanesno data4

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron 6305 1.35
+82.4%
Sempron 3850 0.74

Celeron 6305 outperforms Sempron 3850 by 82% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Celeron 6305 2094
+83.4%
Sempron 3850 1142

Celeron 6305 outperforms Sempron 3850 by 83% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Celeron 6305 743
+364%
Sempron 3850 160

Celeron 6305 outperforms Sempron 3850 by 364% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Celeron 6305 1235
+131%
Sempron 3850 535

Celeron 6305 outperforms Sempron 3850 by 131% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.35 0.74
Recency 1 September 2020 9 April 2014
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 2 4
Chip lithography 10 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 25 Watt

The Celeron 6305 is our recommended choice as it beats the Sempron 3850 in performance tests.

Be aware that Celeron 6305 is a notebook processor while Sempron 3850 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 6305 and Sempron 3850, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 6305
Celeron 6305
AMD Sempron 3850
Sempron 3850

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 136 votes

Rate Celeron 6305 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 5 votes

Rate Sempron 3850 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron 6305 or Sempron 3850, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.