GX-210JA vs Atom Z670
Primary details
Comparing Atom Z670 and GX-210JA processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Series | Intel Atom | AMD |
Architecture codename | Lincroft (2010−2011) | Temash (2013) |
Release date | 11 April 2011 (13 years ago) | 23 May 2013 (11 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $75 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Atom Z670 and GX-210JA basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
Threads | 2 | 2 |
Base clock speed | 1.5 GHz | no data |
Boost clock speed | 1.5 GHz | 1 GHz |
Bus type | cDMI | no data |
Bus rate | 400 MT/s | no data |
Multiplier | 8 | no data |
L1 cache | 56 KB | 128 KB |
L2 cache | 512K (per core) | 1 MB |
L3 cache | 0 KB | no data |
Chip lithography | 45 nm | 28 nm |
Die size | 65 mm2 | no data |
Maximum core temperature | 90 °C | no data |
Number of transistors | 140 million | no data |
64 bit support | - | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Atom Z670 and GX-210JA compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | no data |
Socket | T-PBGA518 | FT3 BGA |
Power consumption (TDP) | 3 Watt | 6 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom Z670 and GX-210JA. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3 | 86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX |
AES-NI | - | + |
AVX | - | + |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
Idle States | + | no data |
Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
Security technologies
Atom Z670 and GX-210JA technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom Z670 and GX-210JA are enumerated here.
VT-d | - | no data |
VT-x | - | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom Z670 and GX-210JA. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR2 | DDR3 |
Maximum memory size | 2.93 GB | no data |
Max memory channels | 1 | no data |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 3.2 GB/s | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | PowerVR SGX535 | no data |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Atom Z670 and GX-210JA integrated GPUs.
LVDS | + | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom Z670 and GX-210JA.
PCI support | - | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
Recency | 11 April 2011 | 23 May 2013 |
Physical cores | 1 | 2 |
Chip lithography | 45 nm | 28 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 3 Watt | 6 Watt |
Atom Z670 has 100% lower power consumption.
GX-210JA, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, 100% more physical cores, and a 60.7% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Atom Z670 and GX-210JA. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Atom Z670 and GX-210JA, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.