Pentium M 778 vs GX-210JA

VS

Primary details

Comparing GX-210JA and Pentium M 778 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3305not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMDPentium M
Power efficiency2.52no data
Architecture codenameTemash (2013)Dothan (2004−2005)
Release date23 May 2013 (11 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

GX-210JA and Pentium M 778 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads21
Boost clock speed1 GHz1.6 GHz
Bus rateno data400 MHz
L1 cache128 KBno data
L2 cache1 MBno data
Chip lithography28 nm90 nm
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on GX-210JA and Pentium M 778 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketFT3 BGAno data
Power consumption (TDP)6 Watt10 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by GX-210JA and Pentium M 778. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVXno data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by GX-210JA and Pentium M 778. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 2 1
Threads 2 1
Chip lithography 28 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 10 Watt

GX-210JA has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 221.4% more advanced lithography process, and 66.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GX-210JA and Pentium M 778. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between GX-210JA and Pentium M 778, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD GX-210JA
GX-210JA
Intel Pentium M 778
Pentium M 778

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 4 votes

Rate GX-210JA on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2 1 vote

Rate Pentium M 778 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about GX-210JA or Pentium M 778, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.