Athlon XP-M 3000+ vs Atom Z520

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Atom Z520 and Athlon XP-M 3000+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Atomno data
Architecture codenameSilverthorne (2008−2010)Barton (2001−2004)
Release date2 April 2008 (16 years ago)January 2001 (23 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$65no data

Detailed specifications

Atom Z520 and Athlon XP-M 3000+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads21
Base clock speed1.33 GHzno data
Boost clock speed0.03 GHz2.2 GHz
Bus typeFSBno data
Bus rate533.33 MT/sno data
Multiplier10no data
L1 cache56 KB128 KB
L2 cache512 KB512 KB
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm130 nm
Die size24.18 mm2101 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Number of transistors47 Million63 million
64 bit support--
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range0.75-1.1Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Atom Z520 and Athlon XP-M 3000+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketPBGA441A
Power consumption (TDP)2 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom Z520 and Athlon XP-M 3000+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching+no data
FSB parity-no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Atom Z520 and Athlon XP-M 3000+ technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom Z520 and Athlon XP-M 3000+ are enumerated here.

VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data

Pros & cons summary


Threads 2 1
Chip lithography 45 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 2 Watt 45 Watt

Atom Z520 has 100% more threads, a 188.9% more advanced lithography process, and 2150% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Atom Z520 and Athlon XP-M 3000+. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom Z520 and Athlon XP-M 3000+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom Z520
Atom Z520
AMD Athlon XP-M 3000+
Athlon XP-M 3000+

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 27 votes

Rate Atom Z520 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Athlon XP-M 3000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom Z520 or Athlon XP-M 3000+, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.