Celeron B730 vs Atom Z670

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Atom Z670 and Celeron B730 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel AtomIntel Celeron
Architecture codenameLincroft (2010−2011)Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Release date11 April 2011 (13 years ago)1 July 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$75$70

Detailed specifications

Atom Z670 and Celeron B730 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads22
Base clock speed1.5 GHzno data
Boost clock speed1.5 GHz1.8 GHz
Bus typecDMIDMI 2.0
Bus rate400 MT/s4 × 5 GT/s
Multiplier818
L1 cache56 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)256K (per core)
L3 cache0 KB1.5 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm32 nm
Die size65 mm2131 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °C100 °C
Number of transistors140 million504 million
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Atom Z670 and Celeron B730 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketT-PBGA518G2 (988B)
Power consumption (TDP)3 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom Z670 and Celeron B730. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3no data
FMA-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Hyper-Threading Technology++
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Atom Z670 and Celeron B730 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom Z670 and Celeron B730 are enumerated here.

VT-d-no data
VT-x-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom Z670 and Celeron B730. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR2DDR3
Maximum memory size2.93 GB16 GB
Max memory channels12
Maximum memory bandwidth3.2 GB/s21.335 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardPowerVR SGX535Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Atom Z670 and Celeron B730 integrated GPUs.

LVDS+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom Z670 and Celeron B730.

PCI support-no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Atom Z670 158
Celeron B730 584
+270%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 11 April 2011 1 July 2012
Chip lithography 45 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 3 Watt 35 Watt

Atom Z670 has 1066.7% lower power consumption.

Celeron B730, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and a 40.6% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Atom Z670 and Celeron B730. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom Z670 and Celeron B730, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom Z670
Atom Z670
Intel Celeron B730
Celeron B730

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1 1 vote

Rate Atom Z670 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 11 votes

Rate Celeron B730 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom Z670 or Celeron B730, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.