Celeron 2.20 vs Atom Z670

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Atom Z670 and Celeron 2.20 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Atomno data
Architecture codenameLincroft (2010−2011)Northwood (2001−2004)
Release date11 April 2011 (13 years ago)November 2002 (21 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$75no data
Current price$900 (12x MSRP)$11.49

Detailed specifications

Atom Z670 and Celeron 2.20 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads21
Base clock speed1.5 GHzno data
Boost clock speed1.5 GHz2.2 GHz
Bus support400 MT/sno data
L1 cache64K (per core)8 KB
L2 cache512K (per core)128 KB
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm130 nm
Die size65 mm2146 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Number of transistors140 million55 million
64 bit support--
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Atom Z670 and Celeron 2.20 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketT-PBGA518478
Power consumption (TDP)3 Watt73 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom Z670 and Celeron 2.20. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Atom Z670 and Celeron 2.20 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom Z670 and Celeron 2.20 are enumerated here.

VT-d-no data
VT-x-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom Z670 and Celeron 2.20. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR2DDR1, DDR2
Maximum memory size2.93 GBno data
Max memory channels1no data
Maximum memory bandwidth3.2 GB/sno data
ECC memory support-no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardPowerVR SGX535no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Atom Z670 and Celeron 2.20 integrated GPUs.

LVDS+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom Z670 and Celeron 2.20.

PCI support-no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Atom Z670 158
+13.7%
Celeron 2.20 139

Atom Z670 outperforms Celeron 2.20 by 14% in Passmark.

Pros & cons summary


Threads 2 1
Chip lithography 45 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 3 Watt 73 Watt

We couldn't decide between Atom Z670 and Celeron 2.20. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Atom Z670 is a notebook processor while Celeron 2.20 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom Z670 and Celeron 2.20, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom Z670
Atom Z670
Intel Celeron 2.20
Celeron 2.20

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1 1 vote

Rate Atom Z670 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 14 votes

Rate Celeron 2.20 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom Z670 or Celeron 2.20, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.