Intel Celeron 2970M vs AMD E2-7110

#ad
Buy
VS

Combined performance score

E2-7110
1.49
+52%

E2-7110 outperforms Celeron 2970M by 52% in our combined benchmark results.

General info

Comparing E2-7110 and Celeron 2970M processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking20282344
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD E-SeriesIntel Celeron
Architecture codenameCarrizo-L (2015)Haswell (2013−2015)
Release date7 May 2015 (8 years old)14 April 2014 (9 years old)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$75
Current price$385 $59 (0.8x MSRP)

Technical specs

E2-7110 and Celeron 2970M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speedno data2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed1.8 GHz2.2 GHz
L1 cacheno data128 KB
L2 cache2048 KB512 KB
L3 cacheno data2 MB
Chip lithography28 nm22 nm
Die sizeno data130 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °C100 °C
Number of transistors930 Million960 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on E2-7110 and Celeron 2970M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketFP4FCPGA946
Power consumption (TDP)12-15 Watt37 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by E2-7110 and Celeron 2970M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, BMI1, F16C, AMD64, VTIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI+-
FMAFMA4no data
AVX+no data
PowerTune-no data
TrueAudio-no data
PowerNow+no data
PowerGating+no data
Out-of-band client management-no data
VirusProtect+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
TSXno data-
Thermal Monitoringno data+
Statusno dataDiscontinued

Security technologies

E2-7110 and Celeron 2970M technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
Identity Protectionno data-
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by E2-7110 and Celeron 2970M are enumerated here.

AMD-V1+
VT-dno data-
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+
IOMMU 2.0+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by E2-7110 and Celeron 2970M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3L-1600DDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data32 GB
Max memory channels12
Maximum memory bandwidthno data25.6 GB/s
ECC memory supportno data-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R2 GraphicsIntel® HD Graphics for 4th Generation Intel® Processors
Quick Sync Videono data+
Enduro+no data
Switchable graphics1no data
UVD+no data
VCE+no data
Graphics max frequencyno data1.1 GHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of E2-7110 and Celeron 2970M integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3
eDPno data+
DisplayPort++
HDMI++
VGAno data+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by E2-7110 and Celeron 2970M integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan1no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by E2-7110 and Celeron 2970M.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

E2-7110 1.49
+52%
Celeron 2970M 0.98

E2-7110 outperforms Celeron 2970M by 52% in our combined benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

E2-7110 2282
+52%
Celeron 2970M 1501

E2-7110 outperforms Celeron 2970M by 52% in Passmark.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

E2-7110 1429
Celeron 2970M 3222
+125%

Celeron 2970M outperforms E2-7110 by 125% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

E2-7110 4974
Celeron 2970M 6248
+25.6%

Celeron 2970M outperforms E2-7110 by 26% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

E2-7110 2407
Celeron 2970M 2489
+3.4%

Celeron 2970M outperforms E2-7110 by 3% in 3DMark06 CPU.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

E2-7110 29.19
+14.8%
Celeron 2970M 33.5

Celeron 2970M outperforms E2-7110 by 15% in wPrime 32.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

E2-7110 2
Celeron 2970M 2
+5.6%

Celeron 2970M outperforms E2-7110 by 6% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

E2-7110 140
Celeron 2970M 164
+17.1%

Celeron 2970M outperforms E2-7110 by 17% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

E2-7110 37
Celeron 2970M 85
+130%

Celeron 2970M outperforms E2-7110 by 130% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

E2-7110 0.45
Celeron 2970M 0.96
+113%

Celeron 2970M outperforms E2-7110 by 113% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core.

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

E2-7110 1.1
+450%
Celeron 2970M 0.2

E2-7110 outperforms Celeron 2970M by 450% in TrueCrypt AES.

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

E2-7110 1090
Celeron 2970M 1410
+29.4%

Celeron 2970M outperforms E2-7110 by 29% in WinRAR 4.0.

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

E2-7110 46
Celeron 2970M 63
+34.6%

Celeron 2970M outperforms E2-7110 by 35% in x264 encoding pass 1.

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

E2-7110 11
Celeron 2970M 12
+8.3%

Celeron 2970M outperforms E2-7110 by 8% in x264 encoding pass 2.

Gaming performance

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 1.49 0.98
Recency 7 May 2015 14 April 2014
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 28 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 12 Watt 37 Watt

The E2-7110 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron 2970M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between E2-7110 and Celeron 2970M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

User ratings

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD E2-7110
E2-7110
Intel Celeron 2970M
Celeron 2970M

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 195 votes

Rate AMD E2-7110 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

This processor has no user ratings yet.

Rate Intel Celeron 2970M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about E2-7110 or Celeron 2970M, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.