Mobile Athlon 64 4000+ vs Athlon XP 1700+
Aggregate performance score
Mobile Athlon 64 4000+ outperforms Athlon XP 1700+ by an impressive 82% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Athlon XP 1700+ and Mobile Athlon 64 4000+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3375 | 3242 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | no data | Mobile Athlon 64 |
| Power efficiency | 0.16 | 0.30 |
| Architecture codename | Thoroughbred (2001−2002) | Newark (2003) |
| Release date | October 2001 (23 years ago) | no data |
Detailed specifications
Athlon XP 1700+ and Mobile Athlon 64 4000+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 1 |
| Boost clock speed | 1.47 GHz | 2.6 GHz |
| Bus rate | no data | 800 MHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | no data |
| L2 cache | 256 KB | no data |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | no data |
| Chip lithography | 180 nm | 90 nm |
| Die size | 150 mm2 | no data |
| Number of transistors | 37 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Athlon XP 1700+ and Mobile Athlon 64 4000+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | A | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 64 Watt | 62 Watt |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.11 | 0.20 |
| Chip lithography | 180 nm | 90 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 64 Watt | 62 Watt |
Mobile Athlon 64 4000+ has a 81.8% higher aggregate performance score, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 3.2% lower power consumption.
The Mobile Athlon 64 4000+ is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon XP 1700+ in performance tests.
Note that Athlon XP 1700+ is a desktop processor while Mobile Athlon 64 4000+ is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon XP 1700+ and Mobile Athlon 64 4000+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
