Mobile Pentium III 750 vs Athlon XP 1600+

Primary details

Comparing Athlon XP 1600+ and Mobile Pentium III 750 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Architecture codenameThoroughbred (2001−2002)Coppermine (1999−2001)
Release dateJanuary 2001 (23 years ago)19 June 2000 (24 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$562

Detailed specifications

Athlon XP 1600+ and Mobile Pentium III 750 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads11
Boost clock speed1.4 GHz0.75 GHz
L1 cache128 KB32 KB
L2 cache256 KB256 KB
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography180 nm180 nm
Die size150 mm2106 mm2
Number of transistors37 million28 million
64 bit support--
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Athlon XP 1600+ and Mobile Pentium III 750 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketA495
Power consumption (TDP)63 Watt16 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon XP 1600+ and Mobile Pentium III 750. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)

Pros & cons summary


Power consumption (TDP) 63 Watt 16 Watt

Mobile Pentium III 750 has 293.8% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Athlon XP 1600+ and Mobile Pentium III 750. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Athlon XP 1600+ is a desktop processor while Mobile Pentium III 750 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon XP 1600+ and Mobile Pentium III 750, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon XP 1600+
Athlon XP 1600+
Intel Mobile Pentium III 750
Mobile Pentium III 750

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 16 votes

Rate Athlon XP 1600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Mobile Pentium III 750 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon XP 1600+ or Mobile Pentium III 750, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.