Celeron Dual-Core T1400 vs Athlon X2 QL-64
Primary Details
Comparing Athlon X2 QL-64 and Celeron Dual-Core T1400 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | 84 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | 2x AMD Athlon | Intel Celeron Dual-Core |
| Architecture codename | Lion (2008−2009) | Merom-2M (2008) |
| Release date | 1 January 2009 (15 years ago) | 1 May 2008 (16 years ago) |
| Current price | $102 | no data |
Detailed Specifications
Athlon X2 QL-64 and Celeron Dual-Core T1400 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 2 | 2 |
| Boost clock speed | 2.1 GHz | 1.73 GHz |
| Bus support | 3600 MHz | 533 MHz |
| L1 cache | 256 KB | no data |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 512 KB |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | no data |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 65 nm |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Athlon X2 QL-64 and Celeron Dual-Core T1400 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | S1 | P |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 35 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon X2 QL-64 and Celeron Dual-Core T1400. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, Enhanced 3DNow!, NX bit, AMD64, PowerNow!, AMD Virtualization | no data |
| PowerNow | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon X2 QL-64 and Celeron Dual-Core T1400 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core
Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.
Benchmark coverage: 19%
Athlon X2 QL-64 outperforms Celeron Dual-Core T1400 by 18% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.
wPrime 32
wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.
Benchmark coverage: 18%
Celeron Dual-Core T1400 outperforms Athlon X2 QL-64 by 10% in wPrime 32.
Pros & Cons Summary
| Recency | 1 January 2009 | 1 May 2008 |
We couldn't decide between Athlon X2 QL-64 and Celeron Dual-Core T1400. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon X2 QL-64 and Celeron Dual-Core T1400, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
