Intel Celeron Dual-Core T1400 vs AMD Athlon X2 QL-66

#ad
Buy
VS

General info

Comparing Athlon X2 QL-66 and Celeron Dual-Core T1400 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Series2x AMD AthlonIntel Celeron Dual-Core
Architecture codenameLion (2008−2009)Merom-2M (2008)
Release date1 September 2009 (14 years old)1 May 2008 (15 years old)
Current price$5.99 no data

Technical specs

Athlon X2 QL-66 and Celeron Dual-Core T1400 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Boost clock speed2.2 GHz1.73 GHz
Bus support3600 MHz533 MHz
L1 cache256 KBno data
L2 cache1 MB512 KB
Chip lithography65 nm65 nm
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Athlon X2 QL-66 and Celeron Dual-Core T1400 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketS1g2P
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon X2 QL-66 and Celeron Dual-Core T1400. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, Enhanced 3DNow!, NX bit, AMD64, PowerNow!, AMD Virtualizationno data
PowerNow+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Athlon X2 QL-66 3320
+21.8%
Celeron Dual-Core T1400 2725

Athlon X2 QL-66 outperforms Celeron Dual-Core T1400 by 22% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

Advantages and disadvantages


Recency 1 September 2009 1 May 2008

We couldn't decide between Athlon X2 QL-66 and Celeron Dual-Core T1400. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon X2 QL-66 and Celeron Dual-Core T1400, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

User ratings

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon X2 QL-66
Athlon X2 QL-66
Intel Celeron Dual-Core T1400
Celeron Dual-Core T1400

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 16 votes

Rate AMD Athlon X2 QL-66 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 284 votes

Rate Intel Celeron Dual-Core T1400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon X2 QL-66 or Celeron Dual-Core T1400, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.