Celeron Dual-Core T3300 vs Athlon X2 QL-64

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

General info

Comparing Athlon X2 QL-64 and Celeron Dual-Core T3300 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Series2x AMD AthlonIntel Celeron Dual-Core
Architecture codenameLion (2008−2009)Penryn (2008−2011)
Release date1 January 2009 (15 years old)1 February 2010 (14 years old)
Current price$102 no data

Technical specs

Athlon X2 QL-64 and Celeron Dual-Core T3300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Boost clock speed2.1 GHz2 GHz
Bus support3600 MHz800 MHz
L1 cache256 KB128 KB
L2 cache1 MB1 MB
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography65 nm45 nm
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Athlon X2 QL-64 and Celeron Dual-Core T3300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketS1Socket P 478
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon X2 QL-64 and Celeron Dual-Core T3300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, Enhanced 3DNow!, NX bit, AMD64, PowerNow!, AMD Virtualizationno data
PowerNow+no data

Security technologies

Athlon X2 QL-64 and Celeron Dual-Core T3300 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon X2 QL-64 and Celeron Dual-Core T3300 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Athlon X2 QL-64 622
+0.3%
Celeron Dual-Core T3300 620

Advantages and disadvantages


Recency 1 January 2009 1 February 2010
Chip lithography 65 nm 45 nm

We couldn't decide between Athlon X2 QL-64 and Celeron Dual-Core T3300. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon X2 QL-64 and Celeron Dual-Core T3300, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon X2 QL-64
Athlon X2 QL-64
Intel Celeron Dual-Core T3300
Celeron Dual-Core T3300

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

User Ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 37 votes

Rate Athlon X2 QL-64 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 34 votes

Rate Celeron Dual-Core T3300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon X2 QL-64 or Celeron Dual-Core T3300, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.