Athlon X2 QL-64 vs Celeron Dual-Core T1700

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron Dual-Core T1700
2008
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.67
+71.8%
Athlon X2 QL-64
2009
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.39

Celeron Dual-Core T1700 outperforms Athlon X2 QL-64 by an impressive 72% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron Dual-Core T1700 and Athlon X2 QL-64 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking27503020
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Celeron Dual-Core2x AMD Athlon
Power efficiency1.811.05
Architecture codenameMerom (2006−2008)Lion (2008−2009)
Release date7 December 2008 (16 years ago)1 January 2009 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron Dual-Core T1700 and Athlon X2 QL-64 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Boost clock speed1.83 GHz2.1 GHz
Bus rate667 MHz3600 MHz
L1 cacheno data256 KB
L2 cache1 MB1 MB
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography65 nm65 nm
Die size143 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistors291 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron Dual-Core T1700 and Athlon X2 QL-64 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketPPGA478S1
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron Dual-Core T1700 and Athlon X2 QL-64. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, Enhanced 3DNow!, NX bit, AMD64, PowerNow!, AMD Virtualization
PowerNow-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron Dual-Core T1700 and Athlon X2 QL-64 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron Dual-Core T1700 0.67
+71.8%
Athlon X2 QL-64 0.39

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron Dual-Core T1700 1058
+70.1%
Athlon X2 QL-64 622

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Celeron Dual-Core T1700 1750
+8.5%
Athlon X2 QL-64 1614

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Celeron Dual-Core T1700 3270
+1.5%
Athlon X2 QL-64 3223

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Celeron Dual-Core T1700 1456
Athlon X2 QL-64 1468
+0.8%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.67 0.39

Celeron Dual-Core T1700 has a 71.8% higher aggregate performance score.

The Celeron Dual-Core T1700 is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon X2 QL-64 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron Dual-Core T1700 and Athlon X2 QL-64, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron Dual-Core T1700
Celeron Dual-Core T1700
AMD Athlon X2 QL-64
Athlon X2 QL-64

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 4 votes

Rate Celeron Dual-Core T1700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 37 votes

Rate Athlon X2 QL-64 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron Dual-Core T1700 or Athlon X2 QL-64, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.