Athlon X2 QL-64: specs and benchmarks

VS

Aggregate performance score

Athlon X2 QL-64
2009
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.39

Athlon X2 QL-64 provides poor benchmark performance at 0.39% of a leader's which is a 96-core EPYC 9655P.

Summary

AMD started Athlon X2 QL-64 sales 1 January 2009. This is a Lion architecture notebook processor primarily aimed at office systems. It has 2 cores and 2 threads, and is based on 65 nm manufacturing technology, with a maximum frequency of 2100 MHz and a locked multiplier.

Compatibility-wise, this is AMD Socket S1 processor with a TDP of 35 Watt.

Primary details

Athlon X2 QL-64 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and pricing.

Place in the ranking3018
Place by popularitynot in top-100
Market segmentLaptop
Series2x AMD Athlon
Power efficiency1.05of 100.00 (Core Ultra 7 164U)
Architecture codenameLion (2008−2009)
Release date1 January 2009 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Basic microprocessor parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters can generally indicate CPU performance, but to be more precise you have to review its test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)
Threads2
Boost clock speed2.1 GHzof 6.2 GHz (Core i9-14900KS)
Bus rate3600 MHz
L1 cache256 KBof 80 KB (EPYC 9965)
L2 cache1 MBof 2 MB (Xeon 6980P)
L3 cache0 KBof 1152 MB (EPYC 9684X)
Chip lithography65 nmof 3 nm (Core Ultra 9 285K)
64 bit support+
Windows 11 compatibility-

Compatibility

Information on Athlon X2 QL-64 compatibility with other computer components and devices: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1of 8 (Xeon Platinum 8454H)
SocketS1
Power consumption (TDP)35 Wattof 500 Watt (Xeon 6960P)

Technologies and extensions

Technological capabilities and additional instructions supported by Athlon X2 QL-64. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, Enhanced 3DNow!, NX bit, AMD64, PowerNow!, AMD Virtualization
PowerNow+

Virtualization technologies

Supported virtual machine optimization technologies. Some are specific to Intel only, some to AMD.

AMD-V+

Benchmark performance

Single-core and multi-core benchmark results of Athlon X2 QL-64. Overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Athlon X2 QL-64 0.39

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Athlon X2 QL-64 622

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Athlon X2 QL-64 201

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Athlon X2 QL-64 384

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Athlon X2 QL-64 1614

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Athlon X2 QL-64 3223

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Athlon X2 QL-64 1468

Gaming performance

Closest competitors

Athlon X2 QL-64's performance relative to its closest rivals among notebook CPUs.


Intel equivalent

According to our data, the closest Intel alternative to Athlon X2 QL-64 is Celeron N3000, which is nearly equal in speed and higher by 3 positions in our ranking.

Here are some closest Intel rivals to Athlon X2 QL-64:

Athlon X2 QL-64 100

Similar processors

Here is our recommendation of several processors that are more or less close in performance to the one reviewed.

Recommended GPUs

People consider these graphics cards to be good for Athlon X2 QL-64, according to our PC configuration statistics.

These are the fastest graphics cards for Athlon X2 QL-64 in our user configuration statistics. There is a total of 112 configurations using Athlon X2 QL-64 in our database.

RTX 4090 GeForce RTX 4090
0.9% (1/112)
GTX 970 GeForce GTX 970
0.9% (1/112)
RX 580 Radeon RX 580
0.9% (1/112)
GTX 770 GeForce GTX 770
0.9% (1/112)
GTX 660 GeForce GTX 660
1.8% (2/112)
GT 1030 GeForce GT 1030
0.9% (1/112)
UHD Graphics UHD Graphics
0.9% (1/112)
ATI HD 5770 Radeon HD 5770
0.9% (1/112)

All comparisons with Athlon X2 QL-64

Community ratings

Here is the rating given to the reviewed processor by our users. Let others know your opinion by rating it yourself.


3.7 37 votes

Rate Athlon X2 QL-64 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon X2 QL-64, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.