Pentium 3560M vs Athlon 64 TF-20
Aggregate performance score
Pentium 3560M outperforms Athlon 64 TF-20 by a whopping 431% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Athlon 64 TF-20 and Pentium 3560M processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3300 | 2580 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | AMD Athlon 64 | Intel Pentium |
| Power efficiency | 0.61 | 2.18 |
| Architecture codename | Sherman (2009) | Haswell (2013−2015) |
| Release date | 1 May 2009 (15 years ago) | 14 April 2014 (10 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $134 |
Detailed specifications
Athlon 64 TF-20 and Pentium 3560M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 1 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.4 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.6 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| Bus rate | 667 MHz | 5 GT/s |
| L1 cache | 0.1 MB | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
| L3 cache | no data | 2 MB |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 22 nm |
| Die size | no data | 130 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 95 °C | 100 °C |
| Number of transistors | no data | 960 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Athlon 64 TF-20 and Pentium 3560M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | S1g1 | FCPGA946 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 25 Watt | 37 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon 64 TF-20 and Pentium 3560M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | MMX, 3DNow!, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, AMD64, Enhanced Virus Protection | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2 |
| VirusProtect | + | - |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | - |
| Thermal Monitoring | - | + |
Security technologies
Athlon 64 TF-20 and Pentium 3560M technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | - |
| EDB | no data | + |
| Secure Key | no data | + |
| Anti-Theft | no data | - |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon 64 TF-20 and Pentium 3560M are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-d | no data | - |
| VT-x | no data | + |
| EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon 64 TF-20 and Pentium 3560M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR3 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 32 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 25.6 GB/s |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Intel HD Graphics for 4th Generation Intel Processors |
| Quick Sync Video | - | + |
| Graphics max frequency | no data | 1.1 GHz |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Athlon 64 TF-20 and Pentium 3560M integrated GPUs.
| Number of displays supported | no data | 3 |
| eDP | no data | + |
| DisplayPort | - | + |
| HDMI | - | + |
| VGA | no data | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon 64 TF-20 and Pentium 3560M.
| PCIe version | no data | 2.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 16 |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.16 | 0.85 |
| Recency | 1 May 2009 | 14 April 2014 |
| Physical cores | 1 | 2 |
| Threads | 1 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 22 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 25 Watt | 37 Watt |
Athlon 64 TF-20 has 48% lower power consumption.
Pentium 3560M, on the other hand, has a 431.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 195.5% more advanced lithography process.
The Pentium 3560M is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon 64 TF-20 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 64 TF-20 and Pentium 3560M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
