Ryzen Threadripper 1940 vs Athlon 64 FX-62

VS

Primary details

Comparing Athlon 64 (Desktop) FX-62 and Ryzen Threadripper 1940 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2772not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesAthlon 64 (Desktop)no data
Power efficiency0.48no data
Architecture codenameWindsor (2006−2007)Zen (2017−2020)
Release dateno data (2024 years ago)29 July 2017 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Athlon 64 (Desktop) FX-62 and Ryzen Threadripper 1940 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)14 (Tetradeca-Core)
Threads228
Base clock speedno data3.2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.8 GHz3.7 GHz
Bus rate1000 MHzno data
L1 cacheno data96K (per core)
L2 cacheno data512 KB (per core)
L3 cacheno data32 MB
Chip lithography90 nm14 nm
Die sizeno data213 mm2
Number of transistorsno data9,600 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Athlon 64 (Desktop) FX-62 and Ryzen Threadripper 1940 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
Socketno dataSP3r2
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt180 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon 64 (Desktop) FX-62 and Ryzen Threadripper 1940. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon 64 (Desktop) FX-62 and Ryzen Threadripper 1940 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon 64 (Desktop) FX-62 and Ryzen Threadripper 1940. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4 Quad-channel

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 2 14
Threads 2 28
Chip lithography 90 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 180 Watt

Athlon 64 FX-62 has 44% lower power consumption.

Ryzen Threadripper 1940, on the other hand, has 600% more physical cores and 1300% more threads, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Athlon 64 FX-62 and Ryzen Threadripper 1940. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 64 FX-62 and Ryzen Threadripper 1940, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon 64 FX-62
Athlon 64 FX-62
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1940
Ryzen Threadripper 1940

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 10 votes

Rate Athlon 64 FX-62 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Ryzen Threadripper 1940 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon 64 FX-62 or Ryzen Threadripper 1940, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.