Performance per price, higher is better.
AMD Athlon 64 3800+: specs and benchmarks
Price now
68$
Games supported
24%
- Interface
- Core clock speed
- Max video memory
- Memory type
- Memory clock speed
- Maximum resolution
Year of release
2004
Performance
0.50
Summary
AMD started Athlon 64 3800+ sales on June 2004 at a recommended price of $160. This is a Venice architecture desktop processor primarily aimed at office systems. It has 1 core and 1 thread, and is based on 130 nm manufacturing technology, with a maximum frequency of 2400 MHz and a locked multiplier.
Compatibility-wise, this is AMD Socket 939 processor with a TDP of 89 Watt and a maximum temperature of 70 °C. It supports DDR1 memory.
It provides poor benchmark performance at
0.50%
of a leader's which is AMD EPYC 9654.
General info
Athlon 64 3800+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and pricing.
| Place in performance ranking | 2665 | |
| Value for money | 1.06 | |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | |
| Architecture codename | Venice (2004−2005) | |
| Release date | June 2004 (19 years old) | |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $160 | of 305 (Core i7-870) |
| Current price | $68 (0.4x MSRP) | of 15854 (Xeon Platinum 8276L) |
Value for money
Technical specs
Basic microprocessor parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters can generally indicate CPU performance, but to be more precise you have to review its test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | |
| Threads | 1 | |
| Boost clock speed | 2.4 GHz | of 6 (Core i9-13900KS) |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | of 7475.2 (Apple M2 Pro 10-Core) |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | of 36864 (Apple M2 Max) |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | of 786432 (EPYC 7773X) |
| Chip lithography | 130 nm | of 4 (Ryzen 9 7940HS) |
| Die size | 230 mm2 | |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 70 °C | of 105 (Core i7-5950HQ) |
| Number of transistors | 227 million | of 9900000 (Ryzen 5 7645HX) |
| 64 bit support | + | |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - |
Compatibility
Information on Athlon 64 3800+ compatibility with other computer components and devices: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | of 8 (Xeon Platinum 8160M) |
| Socket | 939 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 89 Watt | of 400 (Xeon Platinum 9282) |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel number of RAM supported by Athlon 64 3800+'s memory controller. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequency may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR1 | of 5600 (Ryzen 9 7940HS) |
Benchmark performance
Single-core and multi-core benchmark results of Athlon 64 3800+. Overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
Send in your benchmark results
Send your test results of Athlon 64 3800+.
Relative perfomance
Overall Athlon 64 3800+ performance compared to nearest competitors among desktop CPUs.
Intel equivalent
According to our data, the closest Intel alternative to Athlon 64 3800+ is Pentium Dual-Core E2160, which is faster by 2% and higher by 3 positions in our ranking.
Here are some closest Intel rivals to Athlon 64 3800+:
Similar processors
Here is our recommendation of several processors that are more or less close in performance to the one reviewed.
Recommended GPUs
People consider these graphics cards to be good for Athlon 64 3800+, according to our PC configuration statistics.
5.7%
3.4%
3.4%
2.3%
2.3%
2.3%
2.3%
2.3%
2.3%
These are the fastest graphics cards for Athlon 64 3800+ in our user configuration statistics. There is a total of 87 configurations based on Athlon 64 3800+ in our database.
2.3% (2/87)
1.1% (1/87)
1.1% (1/87)
1.1% (1/87)
1.1% (1/87)
1.1% (1/87)
2.3% (2/87)
1.1% (1/87)
1.1% (1/87)
1.1% (1/87)
