Athlon 64 3800+ vs A10-5800K

VS

Aggregate performance score

A10-5800K
2012
4 cores / 4 threads, 100 Watt
1.87
+368%
Athlon 64 3800+
2004
1 core / 1 thread, 89 Watt
0.40

A10-5800K outperforms Athlon 64 3800+ by a whopping 368% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A10-5800K and Athlon 64 3800+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking19933002
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.35no data
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesAMD A-Series (Desktop)no data
Power efficiency1.760.42
Architecture codenameTrinity (2012−2013)Venice (2004−2005)
Release date2 October 2012 (12 years ago)June 2004 (20 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$122$160

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

A10-5800K and Athlon 64 3800+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads41
Base clock speed3.8 GHzno data
Boost clock speed4.2 GHz2.4 GHz
L1 cache128 KB (per core)128 KB
L2 cache1 MB (per core)512 KB
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm130 nm
Die size246 mm2230 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)74 °C70 °C
Number of transistors1,178 million227 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on A10-5800K and Athlon 64 3800+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFM2939
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt89 Watt

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A10-5800K and Athlon 64 3800+ are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A10-5800K and Athlon 64 3800+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR1

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon HD 7660D (800 MHz)no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A10-5800K 1.87
+368%
Athlon 64 3800+ 0.40

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A10-5800K 2964
+367%
Athlon 64 3800+ 635

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.87 0.40
Physical cores 4 1
Threads 4 1
Chip lithography 32 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 89 Watt

A10-5800K has a 367.5% higher aggregate performance score, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 306.3% more advanced lithography process.

Athlon 64 3800+, on the other hand, has 12.4% lower power consumption.

The A10-5800K is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon 64 3800+ in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between A10-5800K and Athlon 64 3800+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A10-5800K
A10-5800K
AMD Athlon 64 3800+
Athlon 64 3800+

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 510 votes

Rate A10-5800K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 54 votes

Rate Athlon 64 3800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A10-5800K or Athlon 64 3800+, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.