AMD Athlon 64 2000+ vs Intel Celeron 2.10
Comparing Athlon 64 2000+ and Celeron 2.10 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture and sales start time and price.
Athlon 64 2000+ and Celeron 2.10 quantitative parameters such as cores and threads number, clocks, manufacturing process, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of Athlon 64 2000+ and Celeron 2.10 performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Number of cores
Number of threads
Manufacturing process technology
64 bit support
Information on Athlon 64 2000+ and Celeron 2.10 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one.
Max number of CPUs in a configuration
Power consumption (TDP)
Types, maximum amount and channel number of RAM supported by Athlon 64 2000+ and Celeron 2.10.
Supported memory types
Non-gaming benchmarks performance of Athlon 64 2000+ and Celeron 2.10. Overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.
Overall benchmark performance
Athlon 64 2000+ 0.29
Celeron 2.10 0.30 +3.4%
Athlon 64 2000+ 238
Celeron 2.10 244 +2.5%
Let's see how good Athlon 64 2000+ and Celeron 2.10 are for gaming compared with game system requirements. Remember that sometimes official requirements may reflect real performance inaccurately.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 64 2000+
Finer manufacturing process technology (65 vs 130 nm)
Less power hungry (8 vs 73 watts)
3DNow! (older SIMD instructions set used by AMD CPUs. Supercedes MMX, works with 64-bit registers)
AMD64 (AMD CPUs 64-bit architecture. Almost identical to Intel 64, save for some little and rarely used nuances)
Advantages of Intel Celeron 2.10
3.4% faster in synthetic tests
So, Athlon 64 2000+ or Celeron 2.10?
Technical City couldn't decide between AMD Athlon 64 2000+ and Intel Celeron 2.10. The differences in performance seem too small.
Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 64 2000+ and Celeron 2.10, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.