AMD Athlon 64 2000+ vs Intel Celeron 2.10

AMD Athlon 64 2000+
Intel Celeron 2.10

General info

Comparing Athlon 64 2000+ and Celeron 2.10 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture and sales start time and price.
Place in performance rating
 
Type
Desktop
 
Desktop
Architecture codename
Lima
 
Northwood
Release date
June 2008
 
November 2002

Technical specs

Athlon 64 2000+ and Celeron 2.10 quantitative parameters such as cores and threads number, clocks, manufacturing process, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of Athlon 64 2000+ and Celeron 2.10 performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Number of cores
1
 
1
Number of threads
1
 
1
Maximum frequency
1 GHz
 
2.1 GHz
L1 cache
128 KB
 
8 KB
L2 cache
512 KB
 
128 KB
Manufacturing process technology
65 nm
 
130 nm
Die size
77 mm2
 
146 mm2
Transistor count
122 million
 
55 million
64 bit support
+
 
no data

Compatibility

Information on Athlon 64 2000+ and Celeron 2.10 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one.
Max number of CPUs in a configuration
1
 
1
Socket
AM2
 
478
Power consumption (TDP)
8 Watt
 
73 Watt

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel number of RAM supported by Athlon 64 2000+ and Celeron 2.10.
Supported memory types
no data
 
DDR1, DDR2

Benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmarks performance of Athlon 64 2000+ and Celeron 2.10. Overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.

Overall benchmark performance

Athlon 64 2000+ 0.29
Celeron 2.10 0.30 +3.4%

Passmark

Athlon 64 2000+ 238
Celeron 2.10 244 +2.5%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good Athlon 64 2000+ and Celeron 2.10 are for gaming compared with game system requirements. Remember that sometimes official requirements may reflect real performance inaccurately.

Advantages of AMD Athlon 64 2000+

Finer manufacturing process technology (65 vs 130 nm)
Less power hungry (8 vs 73 watts)
3DNow! (older SIMD instructions set used by AMD CPUs. Supercedes MMX, works with 64-bit registers)
AMD64 (AMD CPUs 64-bit architecture. Almost identical to Intel 64, save for some little and rarely used nuances)

Advantages of Intel Celeron 2.10

3.4% faster in synthetic tests

So, Athlon 64 2000+ or Celeron 2.10?

Technical City couldn't decide between AMD Athlon 64 2000+ and Intel Celeron 2.10. The differences in performance seem too small.
Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 64 2000+ and Celeron 2.10, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Cast your vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favourite CPU.
AMD Athlon 64 2000+
Intel Celeron 2.10
Like
Like

User rating

Here you can see the rating of the processor by users, as well as give your rating.

Advices and comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon 64 2000+ or Celeron 2.10, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.