A10-9620P vs Apple M4 Pro (14 cores)
Aggregate performance score
Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) outperforms A10-9620P by a whopping 1606% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing M4 Pro (14 cores) and A10-9620P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 181 | 2112 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | Apple M4 | Bristol Ridge |
| Power efficiency | 64.21 | 10.04 |
| Architecture codename | no data | Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) |
| Release date | 30 October 2024 (less than a year ago) | 1 January 2017 (8 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
M4 Pro (14 cores) and A10-9620P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 14 (Tetradeca-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 14 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.5 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.5 GHz | 3.4 GHz |
| L2 cache | no data | 2 MB |
| Chip lithography | 3 nm | 28 nm |
| Die size | no data | 250 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 90 °C |
| Number of transistors | no data | 3100 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | - |
Compatibility
Information on M4 Pro (14 cores) and A10-9620P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | no data | FP4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 40 Watt | 15 Watt |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by M4 Pro (14 cores) and A10-9620P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR3, DDR4 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | Apple M4 20-core GPU | AMD Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge) ( - 758 MHz) |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 26.95 | 1.58 |
| Recency | 30 October 2024 | 1 January 2017 |
| Physical cores | 14 | 4 |
| Threads | 14 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 3 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 40 Watt | 15 Watt |
Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) has a 1605.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, 250% more physical cores and 250% more threads, and a 833.3% more advanced lithography process.
A10-9620P, on the other hand, has 166.7% lower power consumption.
The M4 Pro (14 cores) is our recommended choice as it beats the A10-9620P in performance tests.
Note that Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) is a desktop processor while A10-9620P is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) and A10-9620P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
