FX-9800P vs Apple M4 Pro (14 cores)
Aggregate performance score
Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) outperforms FX-9800P by a whopping 1584% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing M4 Pro (14 cores) and FX-9800P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 180 | 2106 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | Apple M4 | AMD Bristol Ridge |
| Power efficiency | 64.21 | 10.17 |
| Architecture codename | no data | Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) |
| Release date | 30 October 2024 (less than a year ago) | 31 May 2016 (8 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
M4 Pro (14 cores) and FX-9800P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 14 (Tetradeca-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 14 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.7 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.5 GHz | 3.6 GHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 320 KB |
| L2 cache | no data | 1 MB (per module) |
| Chip lithography | 3 nm | 28 nm |
| Die size | no data | 250 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 90 °C |
| Number of transistors | no data | 3,100 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | - |
Compatibility
Information on M4 Pro (14 cores) and FX-9800P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | no data | FP4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 40 Watt | 15 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by M4 Pro (14 cores) and FX-9800P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| FMA | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by M4 Pro (14 cores) and FX-9800P are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by M4 Pro (14 cores) and FX-9800P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR3, DDR4 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | Apple M4 20-core GPU | AMD Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge) ( - 758 MHz) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by M4 Pro (14 cores) and FX-9800P.
| PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 8 |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 26.95 | 1.60 |
| Recency | 30 October 2024 | 31 May 2016 |
| Physical cores | 14 | 4 |
| Threads | 14 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 3 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 40 Watt | 15 Watt |
Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) has a 1584.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, 250% more physical cores and 250% more threads, and a 833.3% more advanced lithography process.
FX-9800P, on the other hand, has 166.7% lower power consumption.
The M4 Pro (14 cores) is our recommended choice as it beats the FX-9800P in performance tests.
Note that Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) is a desktop processor while FX-9800P is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) and FX-9800P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
