Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS vs Apple M2 Max

Aggregate performance score

Apple M2 Max
2023
12 cores / 12 threads, 79 Watt
16.78
Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
2023
8 cores / 16 threads, 35 Watt
17.72
+5.6%

Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS outperforms Apple M2 Max by a small 6% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Apple M2 Max and Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking386345
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesApple M-SeriesAMD Phoenix (Zen 4, Ryzen 7040)
Power efficiency20.1047.91
Architecture codenameno dataPhoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023)
Release date17 January 2023 (1 year ago)13 June 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

Apple M2 Max and Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads1216
Base clock speed2.424 GHz4 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz5.2 GHz
L1 cache3.3 MB512 KB
L2 cache36 MB8 MB
L3 cache48 MB16 MB
Chip lithography5 nm4 nm
Die sizeno data178 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistors67000 Millionno data
64 bit support++

Compatibility

Information on Apple M2 Max and Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Socketno dataFP7/FP8
Power consumption (TDP)79 Watt35 Watt

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Apple M2 Max 38-Core GPUAMD Radeon 780M

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Apple M2 Max 16.78
Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS 17.72
+5.6%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Apple M2 Max 26657
Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS 28144
+5.6%

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Apple M2 Max 2084
Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS 2360
+13.2%

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Apple M2 Max 236
Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS 275
+16.5%

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

Apple M2 Max 15373
+54.4%
Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS 9959

Geekbench 5.5 Single-Core

Apple M2 Max 1967
+0.6%
Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS 1956

WebXPRT 3

Apple M2 Max 405
+36.7%
Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS 296

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 16.78 17.72
Recency 17 January 2023 13 June 2023
Physical cores 12 8
Threads 12 16
Chip lithography 5 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 79 Watt 35 Watt

Apple M2 Max has 50% more physical cores.

Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, on the other hand, has a 5.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 months, 33.3% more threads, a 25% more advanced lithography process, and 125.7% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Apple M2 Max and Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS.


Should you still have questions on choice between Apple M2 Max and Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Apple M2 Max
M2 Max
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 233 votes

Rate Apple M2 Max on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 45 votes

Rate Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Apple M2 Max or Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.