Apple M2 Max vs Ryzen 7 7840S

VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 7 7840S
2023
8 cores / 16 threads, 35 Watt
15.09
Apple M2 Max
2023
12 cores / 12 threads, 79 Watt
16.80
+11.3%

Apple M2 Max outperforms Ryzen 7 7840S by a moderate 11% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 7 7840S and Apple M2 Max processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking467392
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesPhoenix (Zen 4, Ryzen 7040)Apple M-Series
Power efficiency40.8020.13
Architecture codenamePhoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023)no data
Release date5 January 2023 (1 year ago)17 January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 7 7840S and Apple M2 Max basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads1612
Base clock speed3.8 GHz2.424 GHz
Boost clock speed5.1 GHz3.7 GHz
L1 cache512 KB3.3 MB
L2 cache8 MB36 MB
L3 cache16 MB48 MB
Chip lithography4 nm5 nm
Die size178 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data67000 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 7 7840S and Apple M2 Max compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketFP7/FP7r2/FP8no data
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt79 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 7840S and Apple M2 Max. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsRyzen AI, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEno data
AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 7840S and Apple M2 Max. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon 780M ( - 2700 MHz)Apple M2 Max 38-Core GPU

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 7 7840S 15.09
Apple M2 Max 16.80
+11.3%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 7 7840S 23966
Apple M2 Max 26686
+11.3%

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Ryzen 7 7840S 2223
+6.7%
Apple M2 Max 2084

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Ryzen 7 7840S 274
+16.1%
Apple M2 Max 236

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

Ryzen 7 7840S 11288
Apple M2 Max 15373
+36.2%

Geekbench 5.5 Single-Core

Ryzen 7 7840S 1939
Apple M2 Max 1967
+1.4%

WebXPRT 3

Ryzen 7 7840S 296
Apple M2 Max 405
+36.7%

CrossMark Overall

Ryzen 7 7840S 1655
Apple M2 Max 1835
+10.8%

WebXPRT 4 Overall

Ryzen 7 7840S 248
Apple M2 Max 259
+4.6%

Geekbench 6.3 Multi-Core

Ryzen 7 7840S 12598
Apple M2 Max 14863
+18%

Geekbench 6.3 Single-Core

Ryzen 7 7840S 2605
Apple M2 Max 2692
+3.3%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 15.09 16.80
Physical cores 8 12
Threads 16 12
Chip lithography 4 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 79 Watt

Ryzen 7 7840S has 33.3% more threads, a 25% more advanced lithography process, and 125.7% lower power consumption.

Apple M2 Max, on the other hand, has a 11.3% higher aggregate performance score, and 50% more physical cores.

The Apple M2 Max is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 7 7840S in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 7 7840S and Apple M2 Max, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 7 7840S
Ryzen 7 7840S
Apple M2 Max
M2 Max

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 25 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 7840S on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 235 votes

Rate Apple M2 Max on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 7 7840S or Apple M2 Max, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.