AMD A4-7210 vs A9-9425
Comparing A4-7210 and A9-9425 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture and sales start time and price.
A4-7210 and A9-9425 quantitative parameters such as cores and threads number, clocks, manufacturing process, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of A4-7210 and A9-9425 performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Number of cores
Number of threads
Manufacturing process technology
Maximum core temperature
64 bit support
Information on A4-7210 and A9-9425 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one.
Power consumption (TDP)
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A4-7210 and A9-9425. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A4-7210 and A9-9425 are enumerated here.
Types, maximum amount and channel number of RAM supported by A4-7210 and A9-9425.
Supported memory types
Max memory channels
General parameters of GPUs integrated into A4-7210 and A9-9425.
AMD Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge) ( - 800 MHz)
Available interfaces and connections of A4-7210 and A9-9425 integrated GPUs.
Graphics API support
APIs supported by A4-7210 and A9-9425 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A4-7210 and A9-9425.
Non-gaming benchmarks performance of A4-7210 and A9-9425. Overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.
Overall benchmark performance
A4-7210 2681 +15.9%
Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core
A9-9425 2686 +55.1%
Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core
A4-7210 5593 +28.9%
Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core
A9-9425 0.9 +60.7%
Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core
A4-7210 2 +33.3%
Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core
A9-9425 76 +65.2%
Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core
A4-7210 157 +25.6%
A9-9425 25.83 +4.3%
A4-7210 1236 +38.7%
x264 encoding pass 1
A4-7210 51 +0%
x264 encoding pass 2
A4-7210 11 +10%
A4-7210 1 +0%
Geekbench 3 32-bit single-core
A9-9425 2039 +68.9%
Geekbench 3 32-bit multi-core
A4-7210 3524 +6%
A9-9425 1555 +0.1%
Let's see how good A4-7210 and A9-9425 are for gaming compared with game system requirements. Remember that sometimes official requirements may reflect real performance inaccurately.
Advantages of AMD A4-7210
AES (Advanced Encryption Standard instructions set - hardware acceleration of AES encryption and decryption. Speeds up encryption software, e.g. Veracrypt)
AVX (Advanced Vector Extensions - a set of SIMD instructions working with 128- and 256-bit registers)
AMD64 (AMD CPUs 64-bit architecture. Almost identical to Intel 64, save for some little and rarely used nuances)
VT (Virtualization Technology - Intel's virtualization hardware acceleration. Speeds up work with virtual machines)
Enhanced Virus Protection (EVP)
Enduro (saves battery charge by automatically switching between an integrated and discrete AMD GPU depending on workload. Similar to NVIDIA Optimus)
Vulkan (a contemporary API for graphics acceleration, based on now-discontinued Mantle)
Advantages of AMD A9-9425
Much newer (1 June 2016 vs 7 May 2015)
Higher maximum frequency (3700 vs 2200 MHz)
Higher base frequency (3100 vs 1800 MHz)
Less power hungry (10 vs 12 watts)
Virtualization (Hardware acceleration of virtual machines)
So, A4-7210 or A9-9425?
Technical City couldn't decide between AMD A4-7210 and AMD A9-9425. The differences in performance seem too small.
Should you still have questions on choice between A4-7210 and A9-9425, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.