A9-9410: specs and benchmarks

VS

Aggregated performance score

It provides poor benchmark performance at 0.99% of a leader's which is Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WXRyzen ThreadripperPRO 7995WX
Compare

Summary

AMD started A9-9410 sales 31 May 2016. This is a Stoney Ridge architecture notebook processor primarily aimed at office systems. It has 2 cores and 2 threads, and is based on 28nm manufacturing technology, with a maximum frequency of 3500 MHz and a locked multiplier.

Compatibility-wise, this is FP4 processor with a TDP of 25 Watt and a maximum temperature of 74 °C. It supports DDR4-2133 memory.

General info

A9-9410 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and pricing.

Place in performance ranking2339
Place by popularitynot in top-100
Market segmentLaptop
SeriesAMD Bristol Ridge
Architecture codenameStoney Ridge (2016−2019)
Release date31 May 2016 (7 years ago)
Current price$722 of 17802 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX)

Technical specs

Basic microprocessor parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters can generally indicate CPU performance, but to be more precise you have to review its test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)
Threads2
Base clock speed2.9 GHzof 4.7 (Ryzen 9 7900X)
Boost clock speed3.5 GHzof 6.2 (Core i9-14900KS)
L2 cache2048 KBof 98304 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX)
Chip lithography28 nmof 3 (Apple M3 Max 16-Core)
Die size124.5 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °Cof 110 (Core Ultra 7 165H)
Maximum case temperature (TCase)74 °Cof 105 (Core i7-5950HQ)
Number of transistors1,200 millionof 9900000 (Ryzen 5 7645HX)
64 bit support+
Windows 11 compatibility-
Unlocked multiplierNo

Compatibility

Information on A9-9410 compatibility with other computer components and devices: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1of 8 (Xeon Platinum 8160M)
SocketFP4
Power consumption (TDP)25 Wattof 400 (Xeon Platinum 9282)

Technologies and extensions

Technological capabilities and additional instructions supported by A9-9410. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsSingle-Channel DDR4-2133, Virtualization,
AES-NI+
FMA+
AVX+
FRTC1
FreeSync1
PowerTune-
TrueAudio-
PowerNow-
PowerGating-
Out-of-band client management-
VirusProtect-
RAID-

Virtualization technologies

Supported virtual machine optimization technologies. Some are specific to Intel only, some to AMD.

AMD-V+
IOMMU 2.0-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel number of RAM supported by A9-9410's memory controller. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequency may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2133
Max memory channels1of 12 (Xeon Platinum 9221)

Graphics specifications

General parameters of a GPU integrated into A9-9410.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R5 Graphics
iGPU core count3
Enduro+
Switchable graphics1
UVD+
VCE+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A9-9410's integrated GPU.

DisplayPort+
HDMI+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A9-9410's integrated GPU, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12
Vulkan1

Peripherals

Specifications and connection types of supported peripherals.

PCIe version3.0of 5 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX)
PCI Express lanes8of 128 (EPYC 9654)

Benchmark performance

Single-core and multi-core benchmark results of A9-9410. Overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A9-9410 0.99

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

A9-9410 1528

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

A9-9410 2694

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

A9-9410 4619

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

A9-9410 2455

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

A9-9410 2

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

A9-9410 130

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

A9-9410 63

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

A9-9410 0.82

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

A9-9410 1

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

A9-9410 879

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

A9-9410 54

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

A9-9410 10

Geekbench 3 32-bit single-core

Benchmark coverage: 5%

A9-9410 2134

Geekbench 3 32-bit multi-core

Benchmark coverage: 5%

A9-9410 3299

Geekbench 2

Benchmark coverage: 5%

A9-9410 4260

Geekbench 4.0 64-bit multi-core

Benchmark coverage: 2%

A9-9410 3182

Geekbench 4.0 64-bit single-core

Benchmark coverage: 2%

A9-9410 2133

Gaming performance

Relative performance

Overall A9-9410 performance compared to nearest competitors among notebook CPUs.


A8-5545M 101.01
A9-9410 100

Intel equivalent

According to our data, the closest Intel alternative to A9-9410 is Pentium 4405Y, which is nearly equal in speed and lower by 3 positions in our ranking.

Pentium 4405YPentium4405Y
Compare

Here are some closest Intel rivals to A9-9410:

Core i5-4200Y 102.02
Celeron N4020 101.01
A9-9410 100

Similar processors

Here is our recommendation of several processors that are more or less close in performance to the one reviewed.

A8 Pro-7150BA8 Pro7150B
Compare
Pentium 4405YPentium4405Y
Compare
i5-4202YCore i54202Y
Compare
Celeron 1017UCeleron1017U
Compare
i5-4302YCore i54302Y
Compare

Recommended GPUs

People consider these graphics cards to be good for A9-9410, according to our PC configuration statistics.

These are the fastest graphics cards for A9-9410 in our user configuration statistics. There is a total of 916 configurations based on A9-9410 in our database.

User Ratings

Here is the rating given to the reviewed processor by our users. Let others know your opinion by rating it yourself.


2.8 107 votes

Rate A9-9410 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about A9-9410, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.