Celeron 3865U vs A6-9225

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

A6-9225
2018
2 cores / 2 threads
0.87
+1.2%
Celeron 3865U
2017
2 cores / 2 threads
0.86

A6-9225 outperforms Celeron 3865U by 1% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

General info

Comparing A6-9225 and Celeron 3865U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking24232432
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Bristol RidgeIntel Celeron
Architecture codenameStoney Ridge (2016−2019)Kaby Lake-U
Release date1 June 2018 (5 years old)3 January 2017 (7 years old)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$107
Current price$451 $296 (2.8x MSRP)

Technical specs

A6-9225 and Celeron 3865U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed2.6 GHz1.8 GHz
Boost clock speed3.1 GHz1.8 GHz
L1 cache160 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB256K (per core)
L3 cacheno data2 MB (shared)
Chip lithography28 nm14 nm
Die size124.5 mm298.7 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °C100 °C
Number of transistors1200 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on A6-9225 and Celeron 3865U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketBGAFCBGA1356,FPBGA1356
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A6-9225 and Celeron 3865U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsSingle-Channel DDR4-2133 RAM, VirtualizationIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NIno data+
AVXno data+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
My WiFino data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSXno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoringno data+
Flex Memory Accessno data+
SIPPno data-
Smart Responseno data+
Statusno dataDiscontinued

Security technologies

A6-9225 and Celeron 3865U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
MPXno data+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® ME
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A6-9225 and Celeron 3865U are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A6-9225 and Celeron 3865U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR3, DDR4, DDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data32 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data34.1 GB/s
ECC memory supportno data-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge)Intel HD Graphics 610
Max video memoryno data32 GB
Quick Sync Videono data+
Clear Videono data+
Clear Video HDno data+
Graphics max frequencyno data900 MHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A6-9225 and Celeron 3865U integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3
eDPno data+
DisplayPortno data+
HDMIno data+
DVIno data+

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by A6-9225 and Celeron 3865U integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution supportno data+
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096x2304@24Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data4096x2304@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data4096x2304@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A6-9225 and Celeron 3865U integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12
OpenGLno data4.4

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A6-9225 and Celeron 3865U.

PCIe versionno data2.0
PCI Express lanesno data10

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A6-9225 0.87
+1.2%
Celeron 3865U 0.86

A6-9225 outperforms Celeron 3865U by 1% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

A6-9225 1330
+1.1%
Celeron 3865U 1316

A6-9225 outperforms Celeron 3865U by 1% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

A6-9225 271
Celeron 3865U 392
+44.6%

Celeron 3865U outperforms A6-9225 by 45% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

A6-9225 453
Celeron 3865U 691
+52.5%

Celeron 3865U outperforms A6-9225 by 53% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

A6-9225 2532
Celeron 3865U 2853
+12.7%

Celeron 3865U outperforms A6-9225 by 13% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

A6-9225 4193
Celeron 3865U 5425
+29.4%

Celeron 3865U outperforms A6-9225 by 29% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

A6-9225 26.28
+49.8%
Celeron 3865U 39.36

Celeron 3865U outperforms A6-9225 by 50% in wPrime 32.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

A6-9225 1
Celeron 3865U 2
+33.9%

Celeron 3865U outperforms A6-9225 by 34% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

A6-9225 109
Celeron 3865U 142
+30.9%

Celeron 3865U outperforms A6-9225 by 31% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

A6-9225 73
+1.4%
Celeron 3865U 72

A6-9225 outperforms Celeron 3865U by 1% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

A6-9225 0.85
Celeron 3865U 0.86
+1.2%

Celeron 3865U outperforms A6-9225 by 1% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core.

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

A6-9225 1
+24.7%
Celeron 3865U 0.8

A6-9225 outperforms Celeron 3865U by 25% in TrueCrypt AES.

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

A6-9225 852
Celeron 3865U 1108
+30%

Celeron 3865U outperforms A6-9225 by 30% in WinRAR 4.0.

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

A6-9225 49
Celeron 3865U 54
+11.2%

Celeron 3865U outperforms A6-9225 by 11% in x264 encoding pass 1.

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

A6-9225 9
Celeron 3865U 11
+18.7%

Celeron 3865U outperforms A6-9225 by 19% in x264 encoding pass 2.

Geekbench 3 32-bit single-core

Benchmark coverage: 5%

A6-9225 1855
+0.7%
Celeron 3865U 1843

A6-9225 outperforms Celeron 3865U by 1% in Geekbench 3 32-bit single-core.

Geekbench 3 32-bit multi-core

Benchmark coverage: 5%

A6-9225 3103
Celeron 3865U 3224
+3.9%

Celeron 3865U outperforms A6-9225 by 4% in Geekbench 3 32-bit multi-core.

Geekbench 2

Benchmark coverage: 5%

A6-9225 3936
+8.5%
Celeron 3865U 3627

A6-9225 outperforms Celeron 3865U by 9% in Geekbench 2.

Geekbench 4.0 64-bit multi-core

Benchmark coverage: 2%

A6-9225 3035
Celeron 3865U 3564
+17.4%

Celeron 3865U outperforms A6-9225 by 17% in Geekbench 4.0 64-bit multi-core.

Geekbench 4.0 64-bit single-core

Benchmark coverage: 2%

A6-9225 1920
Celeron 3865U 2182
+13.6%

Celeron 3865U outperforms A6-9225 by 14% in Geekbench 4.0 64-bit single-core.

Gaming performance

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 0.87 0.86
Integrated graphics card 1.17 1.84
Recency 1 June 2018 3 January 2017
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm

We couldn't decide between A6-9225 and Celeron 3865U. The differences in performance seem too small.


Should you still have questions on choice between A6-9225 and Celeron 3865U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A6-9225
A6-9225
Intel Celeron 3865U
Celeron 3865U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

User Ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 2208 votes

Rate AMD A6-9225 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 95 votes

Rate Intel Celeron 3865U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about A6-9225 or Celeron 3865U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.