Atom x7-Z8750 vs A6-9225

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

A6-9225
2018
2 cores / 2 threads
0.86
+3.6%
Atom x7-Z8750
2016
4 cores / 4 threads
0.83

A6-9225 outperforms Atom x7-Z8750 by 4% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

General info

Comparing A6-9225 and Atom x7-Z8750 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking24252442
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Bristol Ridge7x Intel Atom
Architecture codenameStoney Ridge (2016−2019)Cherry Trail (2016)
Release date1 June 2018 (5 years ago)1 April 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$37
Current price$451 $1020 (27.6x MSRP)

Technical specs

A6-9225 and Atom x7-Z8750 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads24
Base clock speed2.6 GHz1.6 GHz
Boost clock speed3.1 GHz2.56 GHz
L1 cache160 KBno data
L2 cache1 MB2 MB
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography28 nm14 nm
Die size124.5 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature90 °C90 °C
Number of transistors1200 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on A6-9225 and Atom x7-Z8750 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketBGAUTFCBGA1380
Power consumption (TDP)15 Wattno data

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A6-9225 and Atom x7-Z8750. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsDDR4-2133 RAM (1 channel), PCIe 3, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, TBM, FMA4, XOP, SMEP, CPB, AES-NI, RDRANDno data
AES-NI++
FMA+no data
AVX+no data
SIPPno data-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
Statusno dataDiscontinued

Security technologies

A6-9225 and Atom x7-Z8750 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

Secure Bootno data+
Identity Protectionno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A6-9225 and Atom x7-Z8750 are enumerated here.

VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A6-9225 and Atom x7-Z8750. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data8 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data25.6 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge)Intel HD Graphics 405
Max video memoryno data8 GB
Graphics max frequencyno data600 MHz
Execution Unitsno data16

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A6-9225 and Atom x7-Z8750 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by A6-9225 and Atom x7-Z8750 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data3840x2160
Max resolution over eDPno data2560x1600

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A6-9225 and Atom x7-Z8750.

PCIe versionno data2.0
PCI Express lanesno data2
USB revisionno data3.0
Number of USB portsno data3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A6-9225 0.86
+3.6%
Atom x7-Z8750 0.83

A6-9225 outperforms Atom x7-Z8750 by 4% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

A6-9225 1330
+3.2%
Atom x7-Z8750 1289

A6-9225 outperforms Atom x7-Z8750 by 3% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

A6-9225 271
+53.1%
Atom x7-Z8750 177

A6-9225 outperforms Atom x7-Z8750 by 53% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

A6-9225 453
Atom x7-Z8750 534
+17.9%

Atom x7-Z8750 outperforms A6-9225 by 18% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

A6-9225 2132
Atom x7-Z8750 2426
+13.8%

Atom x7-Z8750 outperforms A6-9225 by 14% in 3DMark06 CPU.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

A6-9225 26.28
Atom x7-Z8750 24.7
+6.4%

A6-9225 outperforms Atom x7-Z8750 by 6% in wPrime 32.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

A6-9225 109
Atom x7-Z8750 133
+22.6%

Atom x7-Z8750 outperforms A6-9225 by 23% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

A6-9225 73
+87.7%
Atom x7-Z8750 39

A6-9225 outperforms Atom x7-Z8750 by 88% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

A6-9225 1
+5.2%
Atom x7-Z8750 1

A6-9225 outperforms Atom x7-Z8750 by 5% in TrueCrypt AES.

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

A6-9225 852
+5.6%
Atom x7-Z8750 807

A6-9225 outperforms Atom x7-Z8750 by 6% in WinRAR 4.0.

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

A6-9225 49
+1.9%
Atom x7-Z8750 48

A6-9225 outperforms Atom x7-Z8750 by 2% in x264 encoding pass 1.

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

A6-9225 9
Atom x7-Z8750 10
+9.9%

Atom x7-Z8750 outperforms A6-9225 by 10% in x264 encoding pass 2.

Gaming performance

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 0.86 0.83
Integrated graphics card 1.17 0.72
Recency 1 June 2018 1 April 2016
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 2 4
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm

We couldn't decide between A6-9225 and Atom x7-Z8750. The differences in performance seem too small.


Should you still have questions on choice between A6-9225 and Atom x7-Z8750, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A6-9225
A6-9225
Intel Atom x7-Z8750
Atom x7-Z8750

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

User Ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 2210 votes

Rate A6-9225 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 5 votes

Rate Atom x7-Z8750 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about A6-9225 or Atom x7-Z8750, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.