Celeron 1020E vs A6-9225

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

A6-9225
2018
2 cores / 2 threads
0.87
Celeron 1020E
2013
2 cores / 2 threads
0.92
+5.7%

Celeron 1020E outperforms A6-9225 by 6% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

General info

Comparing A6-9225 and Celeron 1020E processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking24232396
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Bristol RidgeIntel Celeron
Architecture codenameStoney Ridge (2016−2019)Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
Release date1 June 2018 (5 years old)20 January 2013 (11 years old)
Current price$451 $27

Technical specs

A6-9225 and Celeron 1020E basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed2.6 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.1 GHz2.2 GHz
L1 cache160 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB256K (per core)
L3 cacheno data2 MB (shared)
Chip lithography28 nm22 nm
Die size124.5 mm2118 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data105 °C
Number of transistors1200 Million1,400 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on A6-9225 and Celeron 1020E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketBGAG2 (988B)
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A6-9225 and Celeron 1020E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsSingle-Channel DDR4-2133 RAM, Virtualizationno data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Thermal Monitoringno data+

Security technologies

A6-9225 and Celeron 1020E technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A6-9225 and Celeron 1020E are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A6-9225 and Celeron 1020E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge)Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge)

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A6-9225 0.87
Celeron 1020E 0.92
+5.7%

Celeron 1020E outperforms A6-9225 by 6% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

A6-9225 1330
Celeron 1020E 1406
+5.7%

Celeron 1020E outperforms A6-9225 by 6% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 0.87 0.92
Integrated graphics card 1.17 0.62
Recency 1 June 2018 20 January 2013
Chip lithography 28 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 35 Watt

We couldn't decide between A6-9225 and Celeron 1020E. The differences in performance seem too small.


Should you still have questions on choice between A6-9225 and Celeron 1020E, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A6-9225
A6-9225
Intel Celeron 1020E
Celeron 1020E

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

User Ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 2208 votes

Rate AMD A6-9225 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 2 votes

Rate Intel Celeron 1020E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about A6-9225 or Celeron 1020E, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.