AMD A6-4400M vs Intel Celeron Dual-Core T1500

AMD A6-4400M
Intel Celeron Dual-Core T1500

General info

Comparing A6-4400M and Celeron Dual-Core T1500 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture and sales start time and price.
Place in performance rating
AMD A-Series
Intel Celeron Dual-Core
Achitecture codename
Release date
May 2012
1 May 2008

Technical specs

A6-4400M and Celeron Dual-Core T1500 quantitative parameters such as cores and threads number, clocks, manufacturing process, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of A6-4400M and Celeron Dual-Core T1500 performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Number of cores
Number of threads
Maximum frequency
3.2 GHz
1.87 GHz
Bus support
533 MHz
L1 cache
96 KB
L2 cache
1024 KB
512 KB
Manufacturing process technology
32 nm
65 nm
Die size
246 mm2
Transistor count
1303 Million
64 bit support


Information on A6-4400M and Celeron Dual-Core T1500 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one.
Max number of CPUs in a configuration
Power consumption (TDP)
35 Watt
35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A6-4400M and Celeron Dual-Core T1500. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A6-4400M and Celeron Dual-Core T1500 are enumerated here.

Graphics specifications

General parameters of GPUs integrated into A6-4400M and Celeron Dual-Core T1500.
Integrated graphics

Benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmarks performance of A6-4400M and Celeron Dual-Core T1500. Overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.

Overall benchmark performance

A6-4400M 9.60 +0.5%
Celeron Dual-Core T1500 9.55

3DMark06 CPU

A6-4400M 1804 +28.9%
Celeron Dual-Core T1500 1400

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

A6-4400M 2292 +41%
Celeron Dual-Core T1500 1625

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

A6-4400M 3407 +15.1%
Celeron Dual-Core T1500 2960

Gaming performance

Let's see how good A6-4400M and Celeron Dual-Core T1500 are for gaming compared with game system requirements. Remember that sometimes official requirements may reflect real performance inaccurately.

Advantages of AMD A6-4400M

0.5% faster in synthetic tests
Finer manufacturing process technology (32 vs 65 nm)
SSE (Streaming SIMD Instructions - a SIMD instruction extension working with 128-bit registers)
x86-64 (a general name for 64-bit extension of x86 instruction set. There are AMD64 and Intel 64 versions that differ very little)
AES (Advanced Encryption Standard instructions set - hardware acceleration of AES encryption and decryption. Speeds up encryption software, e.g. Veracrypt)
AVX (Advanced Vector Extensions - a set of SIMD instructions working with 128- and 256-bit registers)
MMX (MultiMedia Extensions - the very first (1996) SIMD instruction expansion for Intel desktop CPUs, works with 64-bit registers)
AMD64 (AMD CPUs 64-bit architecture. Almost identical to Intel 64, save for some little and rarely used nuances)
Virtualization (Hardware acceleration of virtual machines)
AES-NI save

Advantages of Intel Celeron Dual-Core T1500

We are unaware of any advantages of Intel Celeron Dual-Core T1500 over AMD A6-4400M.

So, A6-4400M or Celeron Dual-Core T1500?

Technical City couldn't decide between AMD A6-4400M and Intel Celeron Dual-Core T1500. The differences in performance seem too small.
Should you still have questions on choice between A6-4400M and Celeron Dual-Core T1500, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Cast your vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favourite CPU.
AMD A6-4400M
Intel Celeron Dual-Core T1500

User rating

Here you can see the rating of the processor by users, as well as give your rating.

Advices and comments

Here you can ask a question about A6-4400M or Celeron Dual-Core T1500, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.