UHD Graphics vs UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)

Iris Xe Graphics G7 Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G4 Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs UHD Graphics Xe G1 UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs
VS
UHD Graphics UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) UHD Graphics 64EU UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) UHD Graphics 600 UHD Graphics 605 UHD Graphics 610 UHD Graphics 620 UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs

Aggregate performance score

We've compared UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) and UHD Graphics, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
2021
4.74

UHD Graphics outperforms UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) by a moderate 18% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
UHD Graphics UHD Graphics

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking657616
Place by popularitynot in top-1006
Power efficiencyno data38.37
ArchitectureGen. 12 (2021−2023)Generation 11.0 (2019−2021)
GPU code nameTiger Lake XeJasper Lake GT1
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date11 May 2021 (3 years ago)11 January 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores32256
Core clock speed350 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speed1450 MHz750 MHz
Manufacturing process technology10 nm10 nm+
Power consumption (TDP)no data10 Watt
Texture fill rateno data12.00
Floating-point processing powerno data0.384 TFLOPS
ROPsno data8
TMUsno data16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataRing Bus

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountno dataSystem Shared
Memory bus widthno dataSystem Shared
Memory clock speedno dataSystem Shared
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.2

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD18
−16.7%
21−24
+16.7%
1440p25
−8%
27−30
+8%
4K12
−16.7%
14−16
+16.7%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 15
−6.7%
16−18
+6.7%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
−9.1%
12−14
+9.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 10
+0%
10−11
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 10−12
−9.1%
12−14
+9.1%
Battlefield 5 18
−16.7%
21−24
+16.7%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
−9.1%
12−14
+9.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
Far Cry 5 14
−14.3%
16−18
+14.3%
Fortnite 24−27
−15.4%
30−33
+15.4%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−14.3%
24−27
+14.3%
Forza Horizon 5 12
−16.7%
14−16
+16.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
−16.7%
21−24
+16.7%
Valorant 55−60
−14%
65−70
+14%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 10−12
−9.1%
12−14
+9.1%
Battlefield 5 16
−12.5%
18−20
+12.5%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
−9.1%
12−14
+9.1%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 75−80
−15.4%
90−95
+15.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
Dota 2 36
−11.1%
40−45
+11.1%
Far Cry 5 13
−7.7%
14−16
+7.7%
Fortnite 24−27
−15.4%
30−33
+15.4%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−14.3%
24−27
+14.3%
Forza Horizon 5 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
Grand Theft Auto V 11
−9.1%
12−14
+9.1%
Metro Exodus 8−9
−12.5%
9−10
+12.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
−16.7%
21−24
+16.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16
−12.5%
18−20
+12.5%
Valorant 55−60
−14%
65−70
+14%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 15
−6.7%
16−18
+6.7%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
−9.1%
12−14
+9.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
Dota 2 33
−6.1%
35−40
+6.1%
Far Cry 5 12
−16.7%
14−16
+16.7%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−14.3%
24−27
+14.3%
Forza Horizon 5 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
−16.7%
21−24
+16.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8
−12.5%
9−10
+12.5%
Valorant 55−60
−14%
65−70
+14%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 24−27
−15.4%
30−33
+15.4%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 30−35
−17.6%
40−45
+17.6%
Grand Theft Auto V 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Metro Exodus 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
−9.4%
35−40
+9.4%
Valorant 45−50
−14.6%
55−60
+14.6%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 6−7
−16.7%
7−8
+16.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry 5 8−9
−12.5%
9−10
+12.5%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 6−7
−16.7%
7−8
+16.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
−14.3%
8−9
+14.3%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
−12.5%
18−20
+12.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 0−1
Valorant 21−24
−9.1%
24−27
+9.1%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dota 2 12
−16.7%
14−16
+16.7%
Far Cry 5 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−16.7%
7−8
+16.7%
Forza Horizon 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

This is how UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) and UHD Graphics compete in popular games:

  • UHD Graphics is 17% faster in 1080p
  • UHD Graphics is 8% faster in 1440p
  • UHD Graphics is 17% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 4.74 5.60
Recency 11 May 2021 11 January 2021

UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) has an age advantage of 4 months.

UHD Graphics, on the other hand, has a 18.1% higher aggregate performance score.

The UHD Graphics is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

Intel UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
Intel UHD Graphics
UHD Graphics
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
vs
GeForce MX130 GeForce MX130
UHD Graphics UHD Graphics
vs
RX Vega 9 Radeon RX Vega 9
UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
vs
GeForce MX230 GeForce MX230
Jetson Orin Nano 8 GB Jetson Orin Nano 8 GB
vs
T400 4 GB 4 GB
H100 PCIe 96 GB H100 PCIe 96 GB
vs
RX 7900 XT RX 7900 XT
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
vs
RTX 3090 Ti RTX 3090 Ti
RX 7950 XTX RX 7950 XTX
vs
RTX 3080 Ti 20 GB GeForce RTX 3080 Ti 20 GB
RX 7600M XT Radeon RX 7600M XT
vs
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
H100 SXM5 H100 SXM5
vs
RTX A2000 RTX A2000
Jetson Orin NX 16 GB Jetson Orin NX 16 GB
vs
T400 T400
A30X A30X
vs
A10 PCIe A10 PCIe
RTX A1000 Embedded RTX A1000 Embedded
vs
A10 PCIe A10 PCIe
RX 7900 XT Radeon RX 7900 XT
vs
A10 PCIe A10 PCIe

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.1 30 votes

Rate UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 7240 votes

Rate UHD Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) or UHD Graphics, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.