UHD Graphics 770 vs UHD Graphics P630
Aggregate performance score
We've compared UHD Graphics P630 with UHD Graphics 770, including specs and performance data.
UHD Graphics P630 outperforms UHD Graphics 770 by a minimal 4% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 579 | 585 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | 31 |
| Power efficiency | 29.47 | 28.37 |
| Architecture | Generation 9.5 (2016−2020) | Generation 12.2 (2022−2023) |
| GPU code name | Coffee Lake GT2 | Raptor Lake GT1 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 24 May 2018 (6 years ago) | 27 September 2022 (2 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 192 | 256 |
| Core clock speed | 350 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz | 1650 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm+++ | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 28.80 | 26.40 |
| Floating-point processing power | 0.4608 TFLOPS | 0.8448 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 3 | 8 |
| TMUs | 24 | 16 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | Ring Bus | Ring Bus |
| Width | no data | IGP |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | System Shared | System Shared |
| Maximum RAM amount | System Shared | System Shared |
| Memory bus width | System Shared | System Shared |
| Memory clock speed | System Shared | System Shared |
| Shared memory | + | + |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | Motherboard Dependent |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| Quick Sync | + | no data |
API compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.6 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 18−20
−5.6%
| 19
+5.6%
|
| 4K | 14−16
+0%
| 14
+0%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 12−14
+0%
|
12−14
+0%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 12−14
+8.3%
|
12
−8.3%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 20−22
+5.3%
|
18−20
−5.3%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 12−14
+71.4%
|
7
−71.4%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 12−14
+160%
|
5
−160%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 24−27
+13%
|
23
−13%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 14−16
+7.7%
|
12−14
−7.7%
|
| Metro Exodus | 16−18
+0%
|
16−18
+0%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 18−20
+5.6%
|
18−20
−5.6%
|
| Valorant | 21−24
+31.3%
|
16
−31.3%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 20−22
+5.3%
|
18−20
−5.3%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 12−14
+100%
|
6
−100%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 12−14
+0%
|
12−14
+0%
|
| Dota 2 | 21−24
+10%
|
20
−10%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 27−30
−3.4%
|
30
+3.4%
|
| Fortnite | 35−40
+5.6%
|
35−40
−5.6%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 24−27
+44.4%
|
18
−44.4%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 14−16
+7.7%
|
12−14
−7.7%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 21−24
+144%
|
9
−144%
|
| Metro Exodus | 16−18
+0%
|
16−18
+0%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 50−55
+3.9%
|
50−55
−3.9%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 18−20
+5.6%
|
18−20
−5.6%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 20−22
+5.3%
|
18−20
−5.3%
|
| Valorant | 21−24
+5%
|
20−22
−5%
|
| World of Tanks | 100−110
+4.1%
|
95−100
−4.1%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 20−22
+5.3%
|
18−20
−5.3%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 12−14
+140%
|
5
−140%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 12−14
+0%
|
12−14
+0%
|
| Dota 2 | 21−24
−81.8%
|
40
+81.8%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 27−30
+0%
|
27−30
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 24−27
+62.5%
|
16
−62.5%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 14−16
+7.7%
|
12−14
−7.7%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 50−55
+3.9%
|
50−55
−3.9%
|
| Valorant | 21−24
+5%
|
20−22
−5%
|
1440p
High Preset
| Dota 2 | 7−8
+16.7%
|
6−7
−16.7%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 7−8
+0%
|
7−8
+0%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 35−40
+0%
|
35−40
+0%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
| World of Tanks | 45−50
+2.2%
|
45−50
−2.2%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 10−12
+10%
|
10−11
−10%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 30−35
+0%
|
30−35
+0%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 6−7
+20%
|
5−6
−20%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 12−14
+0%
|
12−14
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 12−14
+9.1%
|
10−12
−9.1%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 9−10
+0%
|
9−10
+0%
|
| Metro Exodus | 8−9
+14.3%
|
7−8
−14.3%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 9−10
+0%
|
9−10
+0%
|
| Valorant | 16−18
+6.3%
|
16−18
−6.3%
|
4K
High Preset
| Dota 2 | 16−18
+0%
|
16−18
+0%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 16−18
+0%
|
16−18
+0%
|
| Metro Exodus | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 18−20
+0%
|
18−20
+0%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 16−18
+0%
|
16−18
+0%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
| Dota 2 | 16−18
+21.4%
|
14
−21.4%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 7−8
+0%
|
7−8
+0%
|
| Fortnite | 6−7
+0%
|
6−7
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 7−8
+16.7%
|
6−7
−16.7%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
| Valorant | 6−7
+0%
|
6−7
+0%
|
This is how UHD Graphics P630 and UHD Graphics 770 compete in popular games:
- UHD Graphics 770 is 6% faster in 1080p
- A tie in 4K
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Cyberpunk 2077, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the UHD Graphics P630 is 160% faster.
- in Dota 2, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the UHD Graphics 770 is 82% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- UHD Graphics P630 is ahead in 35 tests (56%)
- UHD Graphics 770 is ahead in 2 tests (3%)
- there's a draw in 25 tests (40%)
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 6.41 | 6.17 |
| Recency | 24 May 2018 | 27 September 2022 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 10 nm |
UHD Graphics P630 has a 3.9% higher aggregate performance score.
UHD Graphics 770, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between UHD Graphics P630 and UHD Graphics 770.
Be aware that UHD Graphics P630 is a notebook card while UHD Graphics 770 is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
