RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile vs UHD Graphics P630

Aggregate performance score

We've compared UHD Graphics P630 with RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile, including specs and performance data.

UHD Graphics P630
2018
15 Watt
5.58

RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile outperforms Graphics P630 by a whopping 502% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking636158
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency30.1360.46
ArchitectureGeneration 9.5 (2016−2020)Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026)
GPU code nameCoffee Lake GT2GB206
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date24 May 2018 (7 years ago)19 March 2025 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1923328
Core clock speed350 MHz952 MHz
Boost clock speed1200 MHz1455 MHz
Manufacturing process technology14 nm+++5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rate28.80151.3
Floating-point processing power0.4608 TFLOPS9.684 TFLOPS
ROPs332
TMUs24104
Tensor Coresno data104
Ray Tracing Coresno data26
L1 Cacheno data3.3 MB
L2 Cacheno data32 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusPCIe 5.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR7
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared8 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data448.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentPortable Device Dependent

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.31.4
CUDA-12.0
DLSS-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD21−24
−519%
130
+519%
1440p10−12
−590%
69
+590%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 27−30
−590%
200−210
+590%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−592%
80−85
+592%
Hogwarts Legacy 12−14
−583%
80−85
+583%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 24−27
−404%
120−130
+404%
Counter-Strike 2 27−30
−590%
200−210
+590%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−592%
80−85
+592%
Far Cry 5 18−20
−505%
110−120
+505%
Fortnite 35−40
−339%
150−160
+339%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
−415%
130−140
+415%
Forza Horizon 5 16−18
−565%
110−120
+565%
Hogwarts Legacy 12−14
−583%
80−85
+583%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
−550%
140−150
+550%
Valorant 65−70
−215%
210−220
+215%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 24−27
−404%
120−130
+404%
Counter-Strike 2 27−30
−590%
200−210
+590%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 95−100
−181%
270−280
+181%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−592%
80−85
+592%
Dota 2 45−50
−492%
290−300
+492%
Far Cry 5 18−20
−505%
110−120
+505%
Fortnite 35−40
−339%
150−160
+339%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
−415%
130−140
+415%
Forza Horizon 5 16−18
−565%
110−120
+565%
Grand Theft Auto V 21−24
−590%
145
+590%
Hogwarts Legacy 12−14
−583%
80−85
+583%
Metro Exodus 10−12
−673%
85−90
+673%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
−550%
140−150
+550%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
−669%
120−130
+669%
Valorant 65−70
−215%
210−220
+215%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 24−27
−404%
120−130
+404%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−592%
80−85
+592%
Dota 2 45−50
−492%
290−300
+492%
Far Cry 5 18−20
−505%
110−120
+505%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
−415%
130−140
+415%
Hogwarts Legacy 12−14
−583%
80−85
+583%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
−550%
140−150
+550%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
−669%
120−130
+669%
Valorant 65−70
−488%
400−450
+488%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 35−40
−339%
150−160
+339%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 10−12
−700%
85−90
+700%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 45−50
−446%
250−260
+446%
Grand Theft Auto V 6−7
−1367%
88
+1367%
Metro Exodus 5−6
−940%
50−55
+940%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
−479%
220−230
+479%
Valorant 65−70
−269%
240−250
+269%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 9−10
−933%
90−95
+933%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−925%
40−45
+925%
Far Cry 5 12−14
−617%
85−90
+617%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−614%
100−105
+614%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
−600%
40−45
+600%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
−725%
65−70
+725%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 12−14
−675%
90−95
+675%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
−347%
75−80
+347%
Hogwarts Legacy 1−2
−500%
6−7
+500%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−3100%
30−35
+3100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
−1767%
55−60
+1767%
Valorant 30−33
−630%
210−220
+630%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 4−5
−1325%
55−60
+1325%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−1700%
18−20
+1700%
Dota 2 21−24
−471%
120−130
+471%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−820%
45−50
+820%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
−644%
65−70
+644%
Hogwarts Legacy 1−2
−2200%
21−24
+2200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
−667%
45−50
+667%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 6−7
−650%
45−50
+650%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

This is how UHD Graphics P630 and RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile is 519% faster in 1080p
  • RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile is 590% faster in 1440p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Metro Exodus, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile is 3100% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile performs better in 58 tests (98%)
  • there's a draw in 1 test (2%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.58 33.59
Recency 24 May 2018 19 March 2025
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 45 Watt

UHD Graphics P630 has 200% lower power consumption.

RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile, on the other hand, has a 502% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics P630 in performance tests.

Be aware that UHD Graphics P630 is a notebook graphics card while RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics P630
UHD Graphics P630
NVIDIA RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 55 votes

Rate UHD Graphics P630 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 1 vote

Rate RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about UHD Graphics P630 or RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.