UHD Graphics P630 vs Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS and UHD Graphics P630, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS
2024
20 Watt
6.10
+3.6%

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS outperforms Graphics P630 by a minimal 4% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking633644
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency23.4430.17
Architectureno dataGeneration 9.5 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameno dataCoffee Lake GT2
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date3 September 2024 (1 year ago)24 May 2018 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores768192
Core clock speedno data350 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1200 MHz
Manufacturing process technology4 nm14 nm+++
Power consumption (TDP)20 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rateno data28.80
Floating-point processing powerno data0.4608 TFLOPS
ROPsno data3
TMUsno data24

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataRing Bus

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeLPDDR5xSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountno dataSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed8448 MHzSystem Shared
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataPortable Device Dependent

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.3

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD19
+5.6%
18−20
−5.6%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 30−33
+7.1%
27−30
−7.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+8.3%
12−14
−8.3%
Hogwarts Legacy 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 24−27
+4%
24−27
−4%
Counter-Strike 2 30−33
+7.1%
27−30
−7.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+8.3%
12−14
−8.3%
Far Cry 5 21
+10.5%
18−20
−10.5%
Fortnite 35−40
+2.8%
35−40
−2.8%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+3.7%
27−30
−3.7%
Forza Horizon 5 18−20
+5.9%
16−18
−5.9%
Hogwarts Legacy 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
+4.5%
21−24
−4.5%
Valorant 70−75
+2.9%
65−70
−2.9%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 24−27
+4%
24−27
−4%
Counter-Strike 2 30−33
+7.1%
27−30
−7.1%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 100−110
+3%
95−100
−3%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+8.3%
12−14
−8.3%
Far Cry 5 19
+0%
18−20
+0%
Fortnite 35−40
+2.8%
35−40
−2.8%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+3.7%
27−30
−3.7%
Forza Horizon 5 18−20
+5.9%
16−18
−5.9%
Grand Theft Auto V 24
+14.3%
21−24
−14.3%
Hogwarts Legacy 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+9.1%
10−12
−9.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
+4.5%
21−24
−4.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 22
+37.5%
16−18
−37.5%
Valorant 70−75
+2.9%
65−70
−2.9%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 24−27
+4%
24−27
−4%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+8.3%
12−14
−8.3%
Far Cry 5 18
−5.6%
18−20
+5.6%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+3.7%
27−30
−3.7%
Hogwarts Legacy 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
+4.5%
21−24
−4.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 11
−45.5%
16−18
+45.5%
Valorant 70−75
+2.9%
65−70
−2.9%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 35−40
+2.8%
35−40
−2.8%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+9.1%
10−12
−9.1%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 45−50
+2.2%
45−50
−2.2%
Grand Theft Auto V 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Metro Exodus 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+2.6%
35−40
−2.6%
Valorant 65−70
+4.5%
65−70
−4.5%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 10−11
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+7.1%
14−16
−7.1%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Metro Exodus 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Valorant 30−35
+3.3%
30−33
−3.3%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Far Cry 5 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

Full HD
High

Dota 2 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Dota 2 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

4K
Ultra

Dota 2 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

This is how Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS and UHD Graphics P630 compete in popular games:

  • Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS is 6% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Hogwarts Legacy, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS is 100% faster.
  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the UHD Graphics P630 is 45% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS performs better in 43 tests (67%)
  • UHD Graphics P630 performs better in 2 tests (3%)
  • there's a draw in 19 tests (30%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.10 5.89
Recency 3 September 2024 24 May 2018
Chip lithography 4 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 20 Watt 15 Watt

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS has a 3.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, and a 250% more advanced lithography process.

UHD Graphics P630, on the other hand, has 33.3% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS and UHD Graphics P630.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS
SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS
Intel UHD Graphics P630
UHD Graphics P630

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 6 votes

Rate Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 56 votes

Rate UHD Graphics P630 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS or UHD Graphics P630, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.