Quadro 6000 SDI vs UHD Graphics P630

#ad 
Buy
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking587not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency29.25no data
ArchitectureGeneration 9.5 (2016−2020)Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code nameCoffee Lake GT2GF100
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date24 May 2018 (6 years ago)25 July 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$11,499

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores192448
Core clock speed350 MHz574 MHz
Boost clock speed1200 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data3,100 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm+++40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt231 Watt
Texture fill rate28.8032.14
Floating-point processing power0.4608 TFLOPS1.028 TFLOPS
ROPs348
TMUs2456

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusPCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data248 mm
Widthno dataQuad-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared6 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared384 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared747 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data143.4 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent2x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video, 2x SDI

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (11_0)
Shader Model6.45.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.01.1
Vulkan1.3N/A
CUDA-2.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 24 May 2018 25 July 2011
Chip lithography 14 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 231 Watt

UHD Graphics P630 has an age advantage of 6 years, a 185.7% more advanced lithography process, and 1440% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between UHD Graphics P630 and Quadro 6000 SDI. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that UHD Graphics P630 is a notebook card while Quadro 6000 SDI is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics P630
UHD Graphics P630
NVIDIA Quadro 6000 SDI
Quadro 6000 SDI

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 50 votes

Rate UHD Graphics P630 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.4 9 votes

Rate Quadro 6000 SDI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about UHD Graphics P630 or Quadro 6000 SDI, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.